Classic Monsters: The Manual
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I have my own versions of these, but it will be fun to compare and modify, or just use both at once. Really throw a loop around the waist of a "veteran."
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
This just in: The Tarrasque is pretty awesome.
As you were.
As you were.
- Omote
- Battle Stag
- Posts: 11560
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
- Contact:
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
This book needs to be released, immediately. Can't.... control.... urges....
~O
~O
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
- Go0gleplex
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 4065
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 7:00 am
- Location: Keizer, OR
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
That can get you arrested.Omote wrote: Can't.... control.... urges....
~O
"Rolling dice and killing characters since September 1976."
"Author of Wardogs! and Contributor to Iron Stars and Starmada-Admiralty ed."
"Certified crazy since 2009."
"Author of Wardogs! and Contributor to Iron Stars and Starmada-Admiralty ed."
"Certified crazy since 2009."
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I would love to see a huge tome of monsters, a lot of the classics from TSR many monster compendiums. I have always loved the Hound of Ill Omen and the werespider.
But honestly, it needs to be big (like 400+ pages) and be hard back.
For the sole reason that I can drop in on the table in front of my players and say;
"This is my boomstick!"
But honestly, it needs to be big (like 400+ pages) and be hard back.
For the sole reason that I can drop in on the table in front of my players and say;
"This is my boomstick!"
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I noticed Steve doesn't have a "Badger" in the M&T. Even though its a relatively mundane creature, I think I'm going to put it in. Why?
See below: (This video contains a lot of NSFW language. You have been warned.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg&hd=1
See below: (This video contains a lot of NSFW language. You have been warned.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4r7wHMg5Yjg&hd=1
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
WTF?
Honey Badger FTW.
I thought the clip was going to be, "We don't need no stinking badgers!" from UHF, but NO, that was funny.
Honey Badger FTW.
I thought the clip was going to be, "We don't need no stinking badgers!" from UHF, but NO, that was funny.
Bill D.
Author: Yarr! Rules-Light Pirate RPG
BD Games - www.playBDgames.com
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/browse.ph ... rs_id=5781
Author: Yarr! Rules-Light Pirate RPG
BD Games - www.playBDgames.com
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/browse.ph ... rs_id=5781
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
OMG love that narrator! "Oooh that's so naasty!!"
- magick3six
- Ungern
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 4:35 pm
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
"ewwww, it eats snakes!"
Great video.
Great video.
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
New Druid spell: Badger Summoning I
http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/
http://www.badgerbadgerbadger.com/
Bill D.
Author: Yarr! Rules-Light Pirate RPG
BD Games - www.playBDgames.com
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/browse.ph ... rs_id=5781
Author: Yarr! Rules-Light Pirate RPG
BD Games - www.playBDgames.com
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/browse.ph ... rs_id=5781
- Andred of Albans
- Hlobane Orc
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 5:15 pm
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I took my old Monstrous Compendium, scanned them and with the help of Photoshop converted them to C&C. The blank monster page was very useful for making a word template to make my own monsters with.
Visit my
- My Castle & Crusade Blog The Geeky Grognard's Gaming Gazette
Ice River Guards Regiment Warhammer 40k site
Star Trek RPG site
- zarathustra
- Red Cap
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:00 am
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
Personally I would love it if there were something very close to an Illithid (without infringing anyones copyright of course )
- LordSeurek
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:00 am
- Location: Menzoberranzan
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
+1zarathustra wrote:Personally I would love it if there were something very close to an Illithid (without infringing anyones copyright of course )
Anyone remember the xvarts in BG1? Think I'd buy the monster book just to have that critter in c&c form
L.S.
My House Rules : http://www.trolllord.com/forums/viewtop ... 23&t=10497
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
One is, one isn't.LordSeurek wrote:Anyone remember the xvarts in BG1? Think I'd buy the monster book just to have that critter in c&c formzarathustra wrote:Personally I would love it if there were something very close to an Illithid (without infringing anyones copyright of course )
L.S.
- zarathustra
- Red Cap
- Posts: 324
- Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:00 am
- Location: Canberra, Australia
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
Now you are just being cruel being that cryptic.AGNKim wrote:
One is, one isn't.
- LordSeurek
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:00 am
- Location: Menzoberranzan
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
They wont touch the flayer.....zarathustra wrote:Now you are just being cruel being that cryptic.AGNKim wrote:
One is, one isn't.
My House Rules : http://www.trolllord.com/forums/viewtop ... 23&t=10497
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I'm still pulling for dire flumpf.
But seriously, the Prismal Eye was a really cool work around for the beholder. I actually like it in and of itself, so if they did that sort of treatment it would be fine by me,
Still, the MF is easy enough to convert.
I know, converting is easy but there's something about getting it from an official book. I know.
But seriously, the Prismal Eye was a really cool work around for the beholder. I actually like it in and of itself, so if they did that sort of treatment it would be fine by me,
Still, the MF is easy enough to convert.
I know, converting is easy but there's something about getting it from an official book. I know.
Bill D.
Author: Yarr! Rules-Light Pirate RPG
BD Games - www.playBDgames.com
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/browse.ph ... rs_id=5781
Author: Yarr! Rules-Light Pirate RPG
BD Games - www.playBDgames.com
http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/browse.ph ... rs_id=5781
- Omote
- Battle Stag
- Posts: 11560
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
- Contact:
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
Another reason I love the idea of this book and have been so adamant on Kim Hartsfield forcing TLG to release this book sooner rather than later is that I am SO not into luggiung around Monster Manual II and the Friend Folio to every game where I'm going to need some monsters that don't fall into the standard Monsters & Treasure basic creature choices but need these baddies more in line with good old fashioned classic monster goodness and is strikingly different from Monsters & Treasure of Aihrde which is still awesome in it's own right but doesn't fall well into what player characters might run into, say in the Keep on the Borderlands.
[gasps]
~O
[gasps]
~O
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I recently ran the Gauntlet and Sentinel modules, so I have already converted the Xvart to C&C. They are pretty much a blue skinned Kobold.
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
- Omote
- Battle Stag
- Posts: 11560
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
- Contact:
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
This is not directly in response to your post Treeb, but I will reply just the same.
Am I the only one who doesn't like to do even "easy" conversions? I hate doing conversions period, particularly the difficult ones. But even when it comes to easy old-school D&D conversions to C&C, I hate doing it. I'm proficient in doing so, and have done so for years now... still hate it. I'd much rather have official C&C monsters for this. That is one of the reasons I'm looking forward to this product so much.
~O
Am I the only one who doesn't like to do even "easy" conversions? I hate doing conversions period, particularly the difficult ones. But even when it comes to easy old-school D&D conversions to C&C, I hate doing it. I'm proficient in doing so, and have done so for years now... still hate it. I'd much rather have official C&C monsters for this. That is one of the reasons I'm looking forward to this product so much.
~O
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
The only conversions I hate doing are from 4E and 3E to C&C. 2E and earlier are so easy to do I don't even think of them as conversions anymore.
Then again, I like converting from 3E and 4E because with all the options they have my conversions are far less "cookie cutter".
So even though I do not like converting from 3E or 4E, there are times I am glad I am.
That is part of why I am buying the S&W Complete version of the Tome of Horrors. When I don't want such a cookie cutter conversion I'll look at my 3E versions, when I am fine with the simple cookie cutter approach, I'll use the S&W C version.
Then again, I like converting from 3E and 4E because with all the options they have my conversions are far less "cookie cutter".
So even though I do not like converting from 3E or 4E, there are times I am glad I am.
That is part of why I am buying the S&W Complete version of the Tome of Horrors. When I don't want such a cookie cutter conversion I'll look at my 3E versions, when I am fine with the simple cookie cutter approach, I'll use the S&W C version.
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
-
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 2732
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 7:00 am
- Location: The Court of the Crimson King
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
Of course I'll buy this, but I have to admit I don't really understand it.
If it's for easy reference to monsters that couldn't be included due to copyright, how will we look them up without the names? For example, if I am playing an old module that needs a Githyanki, will there be something like it but called a Souvlaki or something?
The blurb on the Anvil implies we'll be getting the same monsters as MM II and Fiend Folio, but I am not sure how that is accomplished if they aren't OGL?
Or is it really some new monsters mixed in with some not-quite-clones with different names, stats, and descriptions?
On the topic of old monsters I'd like to see, the BECMI D&D "Creature Catalog" had some nice ones; chameleon men are pretty awesome.
If it's for easy reference to monsters that couldn't be included due to copyright, how will we look them up without the names? For example, if I am playing an old module that needs a Githyanki, will there be something like it but called a Souvlaki or something?
The blurb on the Anvil implies we'll be getting the same monsters as MM II and Fiend Folio, but I am not sure how that is accomplished if they aren't OGL?
Or is it really some new monsters mixed in with some not-quite-clones with different names, stats, and descriptions?
On the topic of old monsters I'd like to see, the BECMI D&D "Creature Catalog" had some nice ones; chameleon men are pretty awesome.
My C&C stuff: www.rpggrognard.com
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
Very few monsters are "owned" by TSR/WOTC, less than a dozen, at least from the older sources. Illithids, Beholders, probably Githyanki and Githzeri, and a few others.
They don't own Death Knights, for example.
All they "own" is how they were presented. The artwork, the formatting, the wording used. So pretty much everyone can offer a variant. Look at the Beholder variant in the M&T for an example. One Which I think is far nastier than the original Beholder. (Prysmal Eye).
They don't own Death Knights, for example.
All they "own" is how they were presented. The artwork, the formatting, the wording used. So pretty much everyone can offer a variant. Look at the Beholder variant in the M&T for an example. One Which I think is far nastier than the original Beholder. (Prysmal Eye).
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
- gideon_thorne
- Maukling
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
This book needs Firbolgs innit. That is all.
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, 'Save us!' And I'll look down, and whisper 'No.' " ~Rorschach
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
gideon_thorne wrote:This book needs Firbolgs innit. That is all.
Ooooh! Yeah, Firbolgs are a lot of fun!
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I'm pretty sure the Firbolg couldn't be legally added as you know them in D&D. The name could be used as it a mythological name of some Irish rulers, but I don't think they were a giant-kin race.
I know a lot of people assume that the list in the SRD of product identity monsters is all they own, but I believe that small list only refers to what they own in the 3e Monster Manual 1. I could be wrong tho. If I am, than I have a lot more races to do.
I know a lot of people assume that the list in the SRD of product identity monsters is all they own, but I believe that small list only refers to what they own in the 3e Monster Manual 1. I could be wrong tho. If I am, than I have a lot more races to do.
- gideon_thorne
- Maukling
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
If its a creature or people from mythology or history, it can be used.
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, 'Save us!' And I'll look down, and whisper 'No.' " ~Rorschach
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
In the Firbolg's case tho, the D&D version is not presented as it was in mythology. Which would make it a new work. Now you could make a Firbolg that is 2 feet tall, and hurls pebbles, that wouldn't violate Or make the Firbolg just like D&D and name it something else.
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
I am mostly interested in re-envisions of classics, not direct conversions. Little things that make them different.
Also, completely new monsters. Love those.
Also, completely new monsters. Love those.
- gideon_thorne
- Maukling
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Classic Monsters: The Manual
Or I can make a giant sized (larger than human) humanoid, which are sometimes ascribed mystical powers, and call it a Firbolg, since that's what they are described as in mythology, and no one can say a thing about it.
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, 'Save us!' And I'll look down, and whisper 'No.' " ~Rorschach