Troll Lord Games

<r>Turns out I now have 5 post. Heh!<br/> <br/> Game Science Part 1 of 2<br/> <URL url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bR2fxoNHIuU">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bR2fxoNHIuU</URL><br/> <br/> Game Science Part 2 of 2<br/> <URL url="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PxmkWrDbn34">http://www.youtube.com/w...

<t>Following up on this former discussion for anyone who might be interested or who may stumble on this in the future. Gamestation recorded Lou speaking about his dice (and others) at Gen Con this year. Check out the videos on YouTube:<br/> <br/> Part 1<br/> <br/> Title: Game Science Part 1 of 2<br/...

<t>Very cool of Chessex to just openly say that on the site now. They would be the first to say that publicly I think. I don't know how they designate dice as seconds - definitely no micrometers I am fairly sure. I really will have to try to get a bag for myself eventually and see what I get.<br/> <...

<t>Treebore, youre the guy with actual experience on this one and from what it sounds like, the pound dice bags are not as bad as I was made to believe. Then again, I guess that supports my overall idea. If a bubble alone or badly painted numbers are enough to get a dice condemned to the pound bag t...

<t>Thanks Joe. Not a problem at all with posting the link. Took me a while to find it but I have an information sheet that Lou sent us back when we started carrying Gamescience dice.<br/> <br/> The chart here is condensed from Lous promo sheet:<br/> <br/> Manufacturer / least variation / greatest va...

<t>Hi Guys,<br/> <br/> Noticed your post on Gamescience dice and thought I would chime in as both one of the owners of G2 and as a gamer. Hope no one minds this.<br/> <br/> I agree completely with Joe. I recall a time when Gamescience dice were cut more precisely. I have old ones from my original Tw...