Please, oh please, and for the love of god, get someone professional to edit the thing. The appalling typos and grammatical errors on previous volumes are the biggest hurdles I face in convincing new players that C&C is a quality product.
Oh, I'm a dead-set point buy convert. I believed it to be heresy until recently, but a friend pointed out the wholesome, party-balancing goodness of it.
serleran wrote: Yeah, I don't play humans often because I find the idea boring. I'm a human, or so they think - I'd rather play something that was not human. I played nothing but humans for 10 years, and couldn't really grasp why anyone would want to play anything else. When I returned to RPing aft...
<t>I'm a convert. I don't love Eberron, but I do like it, and I started out loathing it.<br/> <br/> A lot of elements seem tacky and camp (warforged, dragonmarks), but I truly, madly, deeply appreciate the attempt at creating a setting which integrates the existence and use of magic, rather than bei...
<t>I think the religious opposition is largely an American thing. I've known gamers here in Australia whose Christian parents grumbled a bit, but I haven't seen any organised opposition to gaming. They're too busy fretting about Harry Potter.<br/> <br/> It seems that even the "hopeless geek" label i...
Thanks for the prompt replies. Quote: The rules regarding this in the PHB are very basic, but they are in there none-the-less, from movement to the bonuses based on flanking and rear positioning. That's good to know. The 3.5 rules are a bit too dense and slow for something which isn't a pure wargame...
<t>My story's pretty typical: loved D&D back in the day, jumped into 3.5 with gusto but got sick of the rules and complexity, and now I'm looking for something faster and more user-friendly.<br/> <br/> C&C looks ideal, but I have a reservation about miniatures.<br/> <br/> In several "sell me...