Search found 5804 matches
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 1:09 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Least favorite class
- Replies: 54
- Views: 1055
Re: monks
Mac Golden wrote: Not to hijack my own thread, but I guess I will. Regarding monks, you have to remember that "monks" are not just the baddies in the scarlet robes. Monks are pugilists in the broadest sense. One of my current favorite characters is my monk, Stone, in Todd Gray's current c...
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:58 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Disarming class restrictions.
- Replies: 7
- Views: 299
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:14 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:20 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Madden 2009
- Replies: 8
- Views: 539
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:16 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:09 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Madden 2009
- Replies: 8
- Views: 539
Madden 2009
<t>Any Madden players out there? I'm a big Madden fan, and have been since the mid 90s (I was a big Tecmo Bowl fan before that ), and I stopped on the way to work this morning and picked up Madden 09. I'm not as big a fan to be outside a store at 12AM...but if I didn't have to work this morning I mi...
- Tue Aug 12, 2008 12:01 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
DangerDwarf wrote: Just picking nits now, but I think it would have been about 1 1/2 years after 3e release. It was released in August of 2000 I think? It also meshes fairly well with the estimated 250,000 print run for 3e I heard mentioned but cant find anything to confirm. All in all it doesn't m...
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 9:36 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
DangerDwarf wrote: While I don't think a single print run was 1/2 million, it doe sin fact show that they wer enot dealing in tiny print runs. A WotC core book print run looks to easily dwarf the print run of any other RPG. So, calling them small isn't likely terribly accurate as far as the RPG mar...
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:22 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Hating the Post Office...
- Replies: 6
- Views: 734
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:00 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
Julian Grimm wrote: I'm going to chime in here and say that now is really not the time to tell anything. It's going to take a couple years to see the full effect of 4e's launch and the impact the GSL has really had. Right now things are shifting and what is true one day may not hold true the next. ...
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:24 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:58 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
DangerDwarf wrote: It's module sales are thus far extremely impressive too. Modules are bought for playing. True. But is it safe to assume that everyone who buys a module does so to play it with the specific rules it's designed to be run with? I'm sure the vast majority of those that buy the 4e mod...
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 10:58 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
Turanil wrote: Oh please, give me som links !! ENworld has become very disappointing lately. I enjoyed the place for years, but now it's dead for me. I made a post two weeks ago : a guy asked if he would see a quality decrease in 4e products, and I answered he would see that quality decrease as soo...
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:43 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
DangerDwarf wrote: I remember seeing a deal awhile back which said the print run was 50% larger than the initial 3.5e print run. Which in turn was larger than the initial 3e print run. And I think 4e is now in its 3rd print run. Didn't it make the NYT best seller list as well? If these numbers are ...
- Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:13 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: C&C on Harn (moved)
- Replies: 12
- Views: 580
<t>Well, I can't say I've CK'd a campaign, but I did DM a 2e game on Harn that ran about 9-10 sessions back in the early 90s - I remember it was not long after the HarnWorld 2nd edition folder came out. Anyway, I had the characters starting in Kaldor. I loved the setting, and still do, but my player...
- Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:16 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: R.I.P. Isaac Hayes
- Replies: 4
- Views: 335
- Sun Aug 10, 2008 5:23 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Roleplayers...
- Replies: 7
- Views: 533
- Sun Aug 10, 2008 4:41 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
<t>Oh, I know it did well, DD. I guess I may have been a little overly harsh, but it only furthers the whole theory that a majority of the players want to move with the game, not stick with the pass 3.x system. Are they moving because it's a better system? Or are they moving because it's the trend -...
- Sun Aug 10, 2008 1:49 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Necromancery Games not doing 4e
- Replies: 66
- Views: 2095
Omote wrote: So far, IMO it seems like 4e is off to a pretty slow start (at least compared to the release of 3e). Maybe that is indicative of the interest level in 4e. Heh, if you listen to the 4e sympathizers, this new edition has sold more than the previous 3 editions (2e, 3e, and 3.5). But I don...
- Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:42 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: The Magical Coffee Mug (Q&A with Mac Golden)
- Replies: 106
- Views: 11572
- Sat Aug 09, 2008 11:10 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Getting married today!
- Replies: 24
- Views: 831
- Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:40 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Ok what happens next? aka the million monkeys story.
- Replies: 86
- Views: 2374
- Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:32 am
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Wizard Bonus Spells...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1212
<t>Exactly. Bonus spells initially equate to the number of spells you have in your spellbook, but are not bound to the spells you are able to cast after that point. If you're a 1st level wizard with an Intelligence of 16, you start being able to cast 4 0-Level and 3 1st level spells. At the point, y...
- Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:18 am
- Forum: Other Games
- Topic: DDI is only $5/month?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3283
- Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:14 am
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Wizard Bonus Spells...
- Replies: 10
- Views: 1212
- Sat Aug 09, 2008 1:05 am
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Monk progression: Is this an error or a valid rule?
- Replies: 83
- Views: 1953
- Fri Aug 08, 2008 6:39 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: The Magical Coffee Mug (Q&A with Mac Golden)
- Replies: 106
- Views: 11572
- Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:53 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Ok what happens next? aka the million monkeys story.
- Replies: 86
- Views: 2374
- Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:49 pm
- Forum: Out of Print
- Topic: Yggsburgh/EastMark trivia game
- Replies: 191
- Views: 61075
- Fri Aug 08, 2008 10:23 am
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Some rules for Zero-Level Characters
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2131