Troll Lord Games

Traveller wrote:
It was decided to concentrate on the most common monsters adventurers face and save demons and devils for another book.

thank you very much for the info.

Does anybody know why there are no Demons&Devils in the monster manual? In which book can I find such goodies like Evistro, Baalor, Legion Devil & Co? thanks for your help.

<t>Ok. Now I understand the turning rules. A bit tricky and surprising because I was rather your (first) opinion that you can again turn and turn, like a duracell cleric. <br/> <br/> Thank you all for clarifying.<br/> <br/> For me its important to "understand" the rules. There should be not many rul...

Buttmonkey wrote: It's your game, so you can always give the ogre a save if you want to. The SIEGE engine is supposed to open things up so you can try anything, not tie you down because of rules mechanics. If you want to try adjudicating something in a non-BTB manner, that is completely within the ...

Well 2 differing opinions. So can he continue to turn the remaining 4 zombies? yes or no? (I guess yes, its logical, but unfortunately no word in the rule for this)

When a cleric turns undead (eg. a group of 6 zombies which are approaching) succeds in the turning and rolls a 2 on his d12. Can he attempt to turn the rest of the remaining zombies (4) the next turn? Thanks for your help.

Relaxo wrote: I'm no expert, but I think #1 in your post is best, IMO, FWIW. I'd say Dex is out b/c it's not like he's throwing it at the ogre, or not as an attack, at least. he could throw the mug anywhere and distract the ogre. I don't think any of your ideas are wrong, however. But i'd say the f...

<t>I would like to know if this is possible within the SIEGE engine:<br/> <br/> Player A (CHA 16 is primary, DEX14 is secondary, bard level 2) tries to distract an oger (HD4, save P) with loud shouts and a thrown beer mug away from the child which hides under a table.<br/> <br/> As I see the CK has ...

Will the Monster & Treasure book 3rd printing (and PHB 4th printing) be available at amazon.co.uk? I am in Europe so this would be a good possibility to buy the book without paying half a dragons treasure hoard for shipment.

coc for Horror

c&c for heroic fantasy

stormbringer for ehem..stormbringer

Savage Worlds for everything else

Having extra rules for them is much too complicated for us. If I want to run more complicated games with hitlocations and helmets I run Runequest or Gurps. C&C should remain simple IMO, so helmets are integrated in the AC in my games. They are rather fluff.

gideon_thorne wrote: Depends on the direction you're coming from? Folks coming from games much more complex find C&C's approach too minimalist. Some folks coming from the other direction find C&C's approach too complex. Its all a matter of perspective. Yeah, this seems so. I for example pla...

Omote wrote: I see nothing wrong with your minature rules at all. In my opinion, I think Attacks of Opportunity do not work in C&C. I have played in a C&C game where AoO were allowed and they are dominating... kind of. The ability to have another attack is a hge bonus in C&C, particular...

gideon_thorne wrote: Funny thing is, with the variations on the Barbarian out already, one could almost use em as cultural backgrounds for a human character, and just tack on a character class on top. Yes of course you could do it vice-versa. But I am friend of minimalism (thats the reason I am int...

anglefish wrote: I did a Planetary Romance one shot as my first go with CnC. Had a blast. Used Action Points along with toys from Slave Lords of Cydonia (Bad Axe Games) and the MARS pdf (Adamant Games). Nothing says cool pulp scifi like rayguns that run on crystals. Even though I had races from Iro...

I think the barbarian is not really necessary. I would rather play a fighter with a certain cultural background. (similar to the bard and knight which I also dont they are good as interesting character classes)

There is nothing principally wrong with my rule ideas? No violaton of any essential rule in c&c? (except the general resistance and hesitation in mini usage )

Jynx wrote: Your rules sound simple which is key to keepign C&C rules lite. I like them! Personally, I use minis all the time but haven't bothered ruling them so much as what you propose. After reading your post, I think it would be nice to have some simple rules layed out so I'm going to borro...

<t>So, I am new to C&C and I am just reading the rules. I never played it and thus I would like to ask the fans here what they think about my ideas for some simple miniature based combat rules which I would like to introduce in C&C.<br/> <br/> Our group are big miniature fans and we want def...

<t>I now have a better impression of the game. With the no-minions, no-feats and no-multiclassing I can live easily. Having them not or making them up by myself is no big loss.<br/> <br/> But unfortunately c&c has no miniature-battle part. Just moving minis around as some do is IMO not really en...

<t>I just detected c&c, like its simplicity and would like to ask following questions:<br/> <br/> -is the use of minis and battlemaps supported? I could not find any rules (not even simple ones) for this in the book.<br/> <br/> -has it a game world? If yes, is there a geographical map out there?...