Search found 320 matches
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:02 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: My heavily house-ruled version of C&C
- Replies: 114
- Views: 16632
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 9:25 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: d20 SRD?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5951
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:49 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: d20 SRD?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5951
Quote: I believe Ryan Dancey, the author of the OGL, did forsee companies doing just that though. He did explain the idea behind the OGL right here. Quote: I'm wondering if they're (WOTC) not contemplating coming up with a streamlined version of the rules that reduces and limits crunchbloat and spe...
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:19 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: d20 SRD?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5951
Quote: of course I just never bought all of those optional books except for the Arms and Equipment and Catacombs Guides. I've heard a lot of good things about the Catacombs Guide. I may be getting the pdf from RPGnow one of these days. Anyone knows if the related Creative Campaigning and Complete B...
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 7:15 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: d20 SRD?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5951
Quote: I'm waiting for 'Races of Dirt' to come out... Some variant races really are funny, here's an uninspired (to say the least) sample from the SRD... Environmental Racial Variants Aquatic Races Aquatic Dwarves Aquatic Elves Aquatic Gnomes Aquatic Goblins Aquatic Half-Elves Aquatic Half-Orcs Aqu...
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 6:53 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: d20 SRD?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5951
Quote: *smiles* The whole SRD/OGL thing is generally not thought of as a wize move in most circles, but it doesn't stop those same people from taking advantage of the thing. If not wise, it is unarguably a bold move... Quote: I think that the original idea was along the lines of: we get everybody p...
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 5:56 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: d20 SRD?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5951
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:43 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: d20 SRD?
- Replies: 42
- Views: 5951
d20 SRD?
<t>Okay, I'm going to sound like a OGL-retard here but what's up with this site (it does look legitimate)? They just give out the entire D&D system for free on the web? What's in it for WotC? It has converted itself into a charitable organization or what? Pardon my ignorance but I've been out of...
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 4:02 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Class Experience Gaps
- Replies: 25
- Views: 3123
Quote: Combat Dominance is great but by the time you get it, the impact it makes is a lot less. By eighth level (as it is right now) it is almost useless. I find a Cleave-like ability to be a good substitute to Combat Dominance which, after all, sounds pretty much like a nerfed version of the Cleav...
- Sat Nov 18, 2006 8:48 am
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: My heavily house-ruled version of C&C
- Replies: 114
- Views: 16632
- Fri Nov 17, 2006 10:34 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: My heavily house-ruled version of C&C
- Replies: 114
- Views: 16632
<t>This will make it look as if I couldn't keep my word (unless you consider "a while" to be a little more than one month...), but the 6th version of my house rules is available on my web page. Other than the occasional revision, tweak or correction, I have added a new race (the Wild Elf) and a much...
- Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:17 am
- Forum: Keeper Advice
- Topic: Encumbrance Errata
- Replies: 34
- Views: 15931
<t>I really don't find the encumbrance system to be complicated at all...I don't know but maybe this second version suffers from the first print version's reputation that still sticks to it...<br/> _________________<br/> "Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy." author unknown <br/>...
- Fri Nov 17, 2006 5:03 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: PDF bookmarking
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1362
PDF bookmarking
<t>Anyone knows how to bookmark a Pdf (a simple solution would be preferable... )? My Adobe Reader's bookmark tab does not offer the option of doing so and PrimoPDF won't convert my Doc file's bookmarks (although it does convert web links)... <br/> _________________<br/> "Abandon the search for Trut...
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:22 pm
- Forum: Keeper Advice
- Topic: Encumbrance Errata
- Replies: 34
- Views: 15931
<t>I don't want to be nitpicking but I guess that the bottle should be added to point 5. I also think that "This would be reduced by 4" should be "This would be reduced by 3". One last thing, I can't seem to find an entry for the scabbard in the equipment list.<br/> _________________<br/> "Abandon t...
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 8:06 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Buying Things Twice but Still Only Having Them Once
- Replies: 14
- Views: 2388
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 7:53 pm
- Forum: Keeper Advice
- Topic: Encumbrance Errata
- Replies: 34
- Views: 15931
- Thu Nov 16, 2006 4:55 am
- Forum: The Crusader
- Topic: Bundles at RPGnow?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 3493
- Wed Nov 15, 2006 9:09 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Charging
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1514
Quote: Well, in 3.X the charge gives a bonus to hit and not a bonus to damage (charging with a lance rfom horseback is the odd one there), so i would say a bonus to damage is much better than a to hit one, and in the game i am playing the rule seems to be fine as is. *Checks 3.X charging rule* Oops...
- Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:30 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Charging
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1514
Charging
Is -4 to AC to high of a penalty to get +2 to damage? Would it be better if it was -2 to AC la D&D 3ed?
_________________
"Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy." author unknown
My C&C Page
My House Rules v8
_________________
"Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy." author unknown
My C&C Page
My House Rules v8
- Wed Nov 15, 2006 7:03 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Monk; unbalanced if Wis bonus to AC?
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1608
<t>I am thinking about changing the Monk's AC progression to the following :<br/> <br/> LVL 1-2 : +2 AC<br/> <br/> LVL 3-5 : +3 AC<br/> <br/> LVL 6-9 : +4 AC<br/> <br/> LVL 10-14 : +5 AC<br/> <br/> LVL 15-20 : +6 AC<br/> <br/> Underpowered, balanced or overpowered?<br/> _________________<br/> "Aband...
- Sat Nov 11, 2006 8:55 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Rolling attributes
- Replies: 16
- Views: 2393
<t>I think that most CKs let their players take the "roll 4d6, drop the lowest and arrange as desired" route. I also allow my players to reroll until the sum of their attribute modifiers is at least +1. It eliminates hopeless or bland characters...<br/> _________________<br/> "Abandon the search for...
- Fri Nov 10, 2006 8:03 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Is Danger D OK?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2618
Quote: I'm still kickin'. It's just been a bit rough after the move. My mom was in a 4-wheeler accident and landed in ICU. She's out of the hospital and doing better, just out of commision for awhile. I also suffered a nasty concussion at work and between the long hours I put in and the concussion ...
- Fri Nov 10, 2006 7:35 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Has anyone added feats & SRD-type skills?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 2610
<t>I let my players roll for secondary skills (2ed style) to add some flavor and depth to their character. I have also included some of the major feats (3ed style) in the form of class abilities but mainly as combat manoeuvers which are available to all classes. You can look at all of this in my hou...
- Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:43 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Attributes above 19
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3552
- Wed Nov 08, 2006 9:17 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Attributes above 19
- Replies: 17
- Views: 3552
- Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:49 am
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Help me get rid of spell memorization
- Replies: 20
- Views: 4161
- Wed Nov 08, 2006 4:21 am
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: Is Danger D OK?
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2618
- Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:04 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: Specialist Wizards
- Replies: 29
- Views: 3082
<t>Nice work on the Necromancer. We definitely think alike for our house rules. If I may add some criticism, I think that you gave him too wide a spell selection which rivals the wizard's one and outshines the illusionist's one, especially considering his narrow field of interests. Maybe you already...
- Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:32 pm
- Forum: Castles & Crusades Open Discussion: General, The Rules, The Law & the Chaos
- Topic: My heavily house-ruled version of C&C
- Replies: 114
- Views: 16632
<t>I've made the 5th version of my house rules available on my web page. I've mostly expanded my deity listing, rebalanced (again... ) the weapons, revised some of the races and made other minor tweaks here and there. I don't expect to make any more changes for a while now (I think that's enough mes...
- Fri Oct 06, 2006 2:53 pm
- Forum: Open Discussion
- Topic: CKG
- Replies: 25
- Views: 709