Troll Lord Games

Vote in this poll about C&C on enworld-
http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=200019

Voted, thanks!

Looks like this topic is getting a bit hot!

M
_________________
"You face Death itself in the form of... 1d4 Tarrasques!"

Partner to Brave Halfling Publishing
http://www.arcanacreations.com

moriarty777 wrote:
Looks like this topic is getting a bit hot!

M

Heh, what else is new? With enworlds particular well known bias to complex systems, the debates often get heated.

The poll is going to be slanted towards complex game systems for that very reason.

Same as if folks posted a poll about C&C over at Dragonsfoot, you'd get a lot more AD&D support.

Unfortunately the web is about the worst place to truly represent a fan base of any rpg system. ^_~`
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven

Peter Bradley

Gave my 2 brief coppers. *voted*

....................................Omote

FPQ
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society

It never ceases to amaze me that people can get riled up about a book about a game about worlds that don't exist. Literally...people need a reality check.

I love C&C, I love D&D, I love fantasy roleplaying games. I mean c'mon...how can more games and more options and more variety ever be a bad thing?

The Velvet Souljah wrote:
It never ceases to amaze me that people can get riled up about a book about a game about worlds that don't exist. Literally...people need a reality check.

I love C&C, I love D&D, I love fantasy roleplaying games. I mean c'mon...how can more games and more options and more variety ever be a bad thing?

Because we humans can't stand, or refuse to understand that people don't like the same things others do.

I'm guilty of it. I can't believe that if people truly gave C&C a solid test run they would want to go back to 3E. It allows you to do anything and easily use anything from many systems. GURPS, Paladium Fanatasy, RIFTS, every edition of D&D.

With how /awesome I see this flxibility and power of the SIEGE engine being, I really have to make myself think about it, not that I ever really understand it, but at least keep my mouth shut.

It really cooks my beans when people say its an old edition rehash that is far more limited than 3E. If 3E is so awesome than why can't it allow me to do what the SIEGE engine does?

Anyways, I voted, and you know what my vote was.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society

Next Con I am attending: http://www.neoncon.com/

My House Rules: http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames

You're one of those Cultists & Cultists I keep hearing about!
...........................................Omote

FPQ
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society

Treebore wrote:
Because we humans can't stand, or refuse to understand that people don't like the same things others do.

Actually, I understand that on a level that would make most people want to scratch their own eyes out...

See, I am an attorney.

Treebore wrote:
Because we humans can't stand, or refuse to understand that people don't like the same things others do.

What do you mean 'we' bi-ped? ^_~`

Us floating brains in jar's have a much more evolved tolerance for differences.
Note my post on that enworld thread.
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven

Peter Bradley

Often times, I wonder if the people that say such have ever really (one or two sessions don't count) played older editions.

I mean, I can see bits of all the old editions (AND bits of 3e, for that matter) in there, certainly more than in 3e, but yeah, the SIEGE Engine has its own brilliance that shines through.

Treebore wrote:
It really cooks my beans when people say its an old edition rehash that is far more limited than 3E. If 3E is so awesome than why can't it allow me to do what the SIEGE engine does?

Anyways, I voted, and you know what my vote was.

Just voted.

Omote wrote:
You're one of those Cultists & Cultists I keep hearing about!
...........................................Omote

FPQ

I finally read the ENWorld thread and now understand your post.

I guess certain 3E "posters" don't look in the mirror.

Plus if they do categorize me that way they obviously didn't try to remember the content of my posts.

Plus I don't get Mythmere's claims we bash d20 over here. I haven't been bashed once for all the times I mention using stuff from 3E.

I think he is confusing stuff with what was said over in the C&C forums on DF. Not here.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society

Next Con I am attending: http://www.neoncon.com/

My House Rules: http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames

mhensley wrote:
Vote in this poll about C&C on enworld-
http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=200019

Thanks for the link. I used to spend more time over there, but got out the habit. Always happy to lend a voice in support of C&C!
_________________
Count Rhuveinus - Lejendary Keeper of Castle Franqueforte

"Enjoy a 'world' where the fantastic is fact and magic really works!" ~ Gary Gygax

"By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes:" - Macbeth

Treebore wrote:
Plus I don't get Mythmere's claims we bash d20 over here.

Not often but it pops up from time to time. I;ve done it a very few times when I'm on a rant or the like, but I keep that to a min.

........................................Omote

FPQ
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society

Oh, this debate. Been too long since the last flare. Yep... exciting.

Anyone remember the last time? If so, they won't be surprised by anything that is creeping into that thread.

And, actually, now thinking about it.... I find it to be funny. Rally around the cultists, boys. Its better than being in the bunker.

I found the poll a pleasant surprise. Seeing many people who at least voted that they have an interest in C&C was pretty encouraging.

serleran wrote:
Oh, this debate. Been too long since the last flare. Yep... exciting.

Anyone remember the last time? If so, they won't be surprised by anything that is creeping into that thread.

I find it interesting that I always seem to be on the outside of the ENWorld majority. I was on the Greyhawk side on FR vs. Greyhawk threads. And then a Kalamar fan when those flames were fanned. And now I'm a C&C fan. I don't go to ENWorld anymore for a reason. They ain't my kind of people.

I voted. Thanks. That was cool.

Now I am going back to my Cultists to roll some dice.
_________________
If you are looking for something to read:
http://bit.ly/QOfso

Visit magehammer's Keep on the Weblands at http://magehammer.googlepages.com

Breakdaddy wrote:
I found the poll a pleasant surprise. Seeing many people who at least voted that they have an interest in C&C was pretty encouraging.

Quite. When one tallies the numbers, one has at least half the voters either playing or interested in the game. Works for me.
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven

Peter Bradley

gideon_thorne wrote:
Quite. When one tallies the numbers, one has at least half the voters either playing or interested in the game. Works for me.

More the reason to get all these mildly curious gamers a free copy of the Quickstart Rules pdf.
--Jeff T.