Page 1 of 2
Wouldn't Troll Lord make more money by dropping SIEGE?
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:09 am
by joela
"Why doesn't third party provider switch to supporting 4E? Won't they make more money than supporting their current OGL system?"
That's one of the biggest arguments 4E advocates ask about Green Ronin, Kenzer, Paizo, and Troll Lords. It's a good question. Isn't making money -- a lot of it -- all your company is about?
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:28 am
by Julian Grimm
They probably don't want to become WOTC subsidiaries like the Games Stealing License makes you when you adopt 4e.
_________________
The Lord of Ravens
My blog
Re: Wouldn't Troll Lord make more money by dropping SIEGE?
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:41 am
by Zebulon
joela wrote:
"Why doesn't third party provider switch to supporting 4E? Won't they make more money than supporting their current OGL system?"
That's one of the biggest arguments 4E advocates ask about Green Ronin, Kenzer, Paizo, and Troll Lords. It's a good question. Isn't making money -- a lot of it -- all your company is about?
My opinion is that maybe Paizo would make more money with 4e than with Pathfinder: maybe. However, my opinion is also that Green Ronin and Troll Lords would lose money in abandoning their products in favor of 4e. The new products would not sell as well as their product lines (True20 and C&C respectively), then, people who want to play Freeport with 4e can do it easily, just they won't be able to buy a 4e companion to Freeport. Not a great loss when you think about all the 4e supplements WotC is already planning to release.
And then, there is the way the GSL is done. But I will thank WotC for it as it will limit the 3PP 4e flood.
_________________
www.lythia.com: Free resources for Harn but also adaptable to any medieval setting.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:48 am
by Indigo Rose
The best of all worlds is if your company can make money while providing a product or service that you created and that you believe in. That's truly the "American Dream", when you can start out from humble beginnings and become great through the product of your own work and imagination. Remember, once upon a time D&D was small and barely known; Gary created TSR because the bigger established companies like Avalon Hill didn't want to risk underwriting an unknown new type of game.
I think Troll Lord can make money *and* still stay true to their own vision of what roleplaying games should be.
_________________
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:55 am
by Harry Joy
You might also think giant robotic water snakes are a good idea too, but they're not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ct5xe2Vnp6c
The little ones are fine just as they are.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:02 am
by Julian Grimm
My sig wrote:
I stopped looking at porn for this?
_________________
The Lord of Ravens
My blog
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:12 am
by Indigo Rose
Also just say "no" to robotic killer sea monkeys.
_________________
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 5:52 am
by Harry Joy
Indigo Rose wrote:
Also just say "no" to robotic killer sea monkeys.
I don't know if I can promise you that. I can try my best, but no promises.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:43 am
by Treebore
The Trolls are about making money. When they were doing d20 they had day jobs. When they went C&C they quit their day jobs.
Who knows? Maybe the Trolls will repeat history.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society
Next Con I am attending:
http://www.neoncon.com/
My House Rules:
http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:28 am
by seskis281
And this I can tell you from personally querying Steve on the subject...
The C&C stuff sells great. Their d20 lines never sold nearly as well.
The business logic that if the "guerilla" of the market does something, all others must do likewise was proven wrong in the d20 bubble bust (take a read on Steve's article in latest Crusader)...
Third-party publishers succeed more when they hit the markets that are not being satisfied by the major, not by trying to copy or emulate them.
Edit: And also, why drop an elegent, simple game mechanic that is far more transferable and usable with all sorts of publications both TLG and otherwise for a very restricted, single form mechanic set that isn't backward or sideways compatible with other systems?
_________________
John "Sir Seskis" Wright
Ilshara: Lands of Exile:
http://johnwright281.tripod.com/
High Squire of the C&C Society
www.cncsociety.org
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:29 am
by DangerDwarf
Because gaming would suck if there was only one system and everyone provided product support for that system.
I like variety.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:05 pm
by Omote
'Cause the Troll Lords do it big. They are badasses. They don't NEED no stinkin' 4E.
-O
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:46 pm
by Go0gleplex
*readies the inquisition* REPENT I SAY!!! REPENT!!! For the Trolls are LORDS and their system shall cast down the false giant that is 4e!
_________________
The obvious will always trip you up FAR more than the obscure.
Baron Grignak Hammerhand of the Pacifica Provinces-
High Warden of the Castles & Crusades Society
Re: Wouldn't Troll Lord make more money by dropping SIEGE?
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:55 pm
by huds0n
joela wrote:
"Why doesn't third party provider switch to supporting 4E? Won't they make more money than supporting their current OGL system?"
That's one of the biggest arguments 4E advocates ask about Green Ronin, Kenzer, Paizo, and Troll Lords. It's a good question. Isn't making money -- a lot of it -- all your company is about?
I don't even know to begin to respond to this. I'm at a complete loss.
_________________
Richard McBain
Trolllord Games
Convention Coordinator
Executive Director - TrollCon, Winter Dark
richard@trolllord.com
------------------------------------------
ALEA IACTA EST - THE DIE IS CAST
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:03 pm
by Deogolf
Boy, that's a loaded question! If everyone was making money, where did they all go??
I don't mean to be an ass, but have you read what their philosophy towards gaming is? There's more to gaming than just 4ed. Besides, the scuttlebutt is that some of the companies that supported 3.0/3.5 are not making the switch. Why? Because of the GSL.
TLG is doing just fine and they don't need to sell their souls to make money. Okay, that might be a little much, but I think you get the picture.
We are not lemmings!
_________________
Eulaliaaa!!! Give those rapscallions blood and vinegar, wot?!
Be sure to check out Jim's artwork for sale:
http://jimhollowayart.com/id5.html
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 2:57 pm
by serleran
1st - No, the Trolls aren't "all about making money." They are not a corporation, nor are they expunged from the masses of gamers from whence they came. They do what they do because it is what they enjoy - that is as simple as it gets.
2nd - having to wait months before you can officially support a new system means you are out months of revenue, and then more, because you cannot convert your old materials to the new - this means you are either all new (cost prohibitive - have to reprint everything, pay for new manuscripts, new art, new everything) or you stay "old" (perhaps lose customers.) You lose either way, unless you have your own thing to do.
And, there are other reasons but I won't go into them.
Re: Wouldn't Troll Lord make more money by dropping SIEGE?
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:13 pm
by Harry Joy
huds0n wrote:
I don't even know to begin to respond to this. I'm at a complete loss.
Giant robotic water snakes. Or robotic killer sea monkeys. Both excellent choices.
hth
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 3:15 pm
by Zebulon
Personally, I would be glad if only WotC produced 4e stuff, and 3PP stayed with their own OGL products. At least, I don't see my preferred publishers (GR and TL) doing 4e stuff any time soon.
_________________
www.lythia.com: Free resources for Harn but also adaptable to any medieval setting.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:20 pm
by Foxroe
Why switch to 4ed? Wait for 4.5ed (you know it's coming)...
-Fox
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:35 pm
by Treebore
Foxroe wrote:
Why switch to 4ed? Wait for 4.5ed (you know it's coming)...
-Fox
You'll have a while to wait. I think the first year is 4.01, year two is 4.02, etc...
Or maybe they'll be going with 4.1, 4.2, and so on. So you would have to wait 5 to 50 years to see 4.5.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society
Next Con I am attending:
http://www.neoncon.com/
My House Rules:
http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 4:49 pm
by Foxroe
Treebore wrote:
You'll have a while to wait. I think the first year is 4.01, year two is 4.02, etc...
Or maybe they'll be going with 4.1, 4.2, and so on. So you would have to wait 5 to 50 years to see 4.5.
True. Plus there's the security updates, the service packs, the Malicious Gamer Removal Tool, and those cool looking little add-ons that just make your game crash.
-Fox
Re: Wouldn't Troll Lord make more money by dropping SIEGE?
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 6:45 pm
by cuchulainkevin
[quote="joela"]"Why doesn't third party provider switch to supporting 4E? Won't they make more money than supporting their current OGL system?"
quote]
No.
_________________
A Room Zoom Zoom. A Room Zoom Zoom. Gilly Gilly Gilly Gilly Ot Zat Za Come open the magic door with me, With your imagination there's so much we can see. There is a doorway that leads to a place. I'll find my way by the smile on your face.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:14 pm
by Jyrdan Fairblade
Why would dropping Sieg rake in more money? I wouldn't think the poor fellow would take that very well...
Seriously, let WotC have 4e - I will be more than happy to see other rules systems flourish under other companies (including and especially C&C!).
Re: Wouldn't Troll Lord make more money by dropping SIEGE?
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:23 pm
by Taranthyll
joela wrote:
"Why doesn't third party provider switch to supporting 4E? Won't they make more money than supporting their current OGL system?"
Have you taken a look at the GSL? Its pretty scary - if I were a publisher I wouldn't go near it. Among other things the clause that states that WotC can terminate the GSL without cause, which could potentially leave a publisher holding the bag (filled with a bunch of his product he can no longer sell), would scare me off all by itself and there are lots of other clauses that I wouldn't be comfortable with.
Furthermore, homogenization of the gaming industry would be a very bad thing. "One Game To Rule Them All..." would not be good for the hobby. A wide diversity of game systems that appeal to a myriad of interests and preferences is indicative of a robust and healthy gaming industry.
Vive la difference!
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:50 pm
by Indigo Rose
Jyrdan Fairblade wrote:
Why would dropping Sieg rake in more money? I wouldn't think the poor fellow would take that very well...
I'll never drop Sieg! Never, ever! He's my very favorite gaming system...engine...mechanic...um, thingy! And he does great voices for NPCs, too, and helps around the house. Our cats love him, too!
_________________
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 8:57 pm
by Indigo Rose
Harry Joy wrote:
I don't know if I can promise you that. I can try my best, but no promises.
Well, just remember that if they get out of hand, the deactivation interface module is hidden in the left buttcheek (according to the voice-activated Agency Guide To Villains handheld device).
_________________
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:26 pm
by seskis281
And, as an addendum, while certainly WotC will sell lots of books, the question is will it really be a "hit." Remember, they have also made this an extremely expensive product to make, and just stopping by my FLGS I asked how it's selling tonight and the answer is "kinda average - lot's of people sticking with what they've got." There's not going to be the quick sell-through and restock that occurred with 3.0 most likely.
So, in short, to the OP: don't assume that throwing away one's independence and creative control by signing that very dictatorial GSL will mean more money.
Oh, and I second the vote to not drop Sieg. I like his stuff, and he was the most gracious and helpful person several years ago in getting some of my stuff up on DF when he was still section editor over there. I was saddened that he and Indigo were not at LGGC so I could shake his hand and thank him!
_________________
John "Sir Seskis" Wright
Ilshara: Lands of Exile:
http://johnwright281.tripod.com/
High Squire of the C&C Society
www.cncsociety.org
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 10:57 pm
by sieg
Glad to know that I (probably) won't be dropped anytime soon.
Though oddly enough, when C&C first came out I was accused by some rabid 1E folk of "Betraying" AD&D and the proof of my turncoat nature was that TLG bribed me by naming the "Siege Engine" after me.
No, really! Its what he said!
_________________
Always remember, as a first principle of all D&D: playing BtB is not now, never was and never will be old school.- Tim Kask, Dragonsfoot
Posted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 11:00 pm
by serleran
You betrayed sieg-a.
*dice hum and get hotter*
[Om malarkey malarkey ummmm]
You betrayed sieg-a
*dice burn a hole through the Crown Royal dice bag*
[Om Gygax Mentzer Kuntz om]
I'm not seeing it.
Re: Wouldn't Troll Lord make more money by dropping SIEGE?
Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:17 am
by gideon_thorne
joela wrote:
"Why doesn't third party provider switch to supporting 4E? Won't they make more money than supporting their current OGL system?"
That's one of the biggest arguments 4E advocates ask about Green Ronin, Kenzer, Paizo, and Troll Lords. It's a good question. Isn't making money -- a lot of it -- all your company is about?
No, cause the way the GSL is set up, it's not worth any money to be bent over and poked up the pooper.
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven
Peter Bradley