Fri May 17, 2019 4:53 am
Sat May 18, 2019 12:54 am
Sat May 18, 2019 2:09 am
Sat May 18, 2019 2:55 am
azcromntic wrote:So 11 people looked at my post and none of you could say 'yes' or 'no'. Perfect. Great forum!
Sat May 18, 2019 2:40 pm
Sat May 18, 2019 2:40 pm
Sun May 19, 2019 12:53 am
Sun May 19, 2019 1:27 am
maximus wrote:Haven't been on the forum of much late, but keep in mind sometimes folks just don't have anything to contribute. That being said, maybe DMMike can be of some help. He still comes around from time to time.
Mon May 20, 2019 12:29 am
Mon May 20, 2019 5:44 am
DMMike wrote:Hello azcromntic,
Sorry for the delay, we had thunderstorms come through this weekend and the internet went out...
As for the pdf, Lurker is right I'm afraid. I'd just point out that we gave many of the typo corrections to TLG prior to publication but apparently the Trolls inadvertently sent the non-corrected file to the printer rather than the corrected one. I know that's not great to hear but its all I got.
As for the 3d4 comment you made, that was a bit of sentence structure iffiness. The "1" being referred to is the original Charisma check on the Prior Engagement shortcoming (D20). A fail means the character cannot join combat for 3d4 rounds. A "1" on that Charisma check (ie a critical fail) means the character in question cannot assist in that combat at all and must wait until afterwards to rejoin their allies.
It will be duly noted in the errata, and when the rules get republished I will do my darndest to get it fixed. That's all I can promise.
If you'd rather go to AA or whatever, that's fine too. Its your table, and whatever you play and have fun at is all good!
Mike Stewart