Umbrage Saga Box Set - Quality Question
Posted: Mon Jul 25, 2011 1:47 am
Hi all,
I've been poring through C&C's Core Rulebook, and generally like what I've found although I have some minor concerns which I'll withhold judgement on until I can actually play the game.
I'm interested in the Umbrage Saga Box set, but I admit that I tend to get annoyed with inconsistencies, sloppy editing, and logical holes: all of which I found in a 1st edition "Assault on Blacktooth Ridge".
Examples:
General typos: at least 1, sometimes more per page. Some creatures were shown in the wrong places, stat blocks had quite a few typos in places.
Inconsistent naming: Characters are often given 2, even 3 different spellings, sometimes in adjacent sentences! Grakmuk/Gakmuk, Maglerod/Marglerod/Maglerd, etc.
Logical holes: Green, moss like plant... in a dungeon. I doubt it. Fungi I can accept, anything that requires sunlight (ie, green plants) not so much...
Then there was the door by the dungeon entrance. The warning makes no sense on two levels. The first level is that even when I knew what the reason for the warning was, I couldn't see how anyone would guess what it meant. The second, is why would whoever wrote it give that warning at all? Anyone who was supposed to come to the dungeon as a friend certainly would have been told to not attack the demons. And anyone else... well, it would be like giving a cryptic message above your door to any prospective burglar to go around to the back door to avoid the house alarm.
Yeah, the above are nits... But I have a large number of modules which are both high quality adventures and don't have the issues I describe. So, my question is: is the boxed set (which has the 2nd edition of Assault on Blacktooth Ridge), better quality that the 1st edition of the module in question?
I've been poring through C&C's Core Rulebook, and generally like what I've found although I have some minor concerns which I'll withhold judgement on until I can actually play the game.
I'm interested in the Umbrage Saga Box set, but I admit that I tend to get annoyed with inconsistencies, sloppy editing, and logical holes: all of which I found in a 1st edition "Assault on Blacktooth Ridge".
Examples:
General typos: at least 1, sometimes more per page. Some creatures were shown in the wrong places, stat blocks had quite a few typos in places.
Inconsistent naming: Characters are often given 2, even 3 different spellings, sometimes in adjacent sentences! Grakmuk/Gakmuk, Maglerod/Marglerod/Maglerd, etc.
Logical holes: Green, moss like plant... in a dungeon. I doubt it. Fungi I can accept, anything that requires sunlight (ie, green plants) not so much...
Then there was the door by the dungeon entrance. The warning makes no sense on two levels. The first level is that even when I knew what the reason for the warning was, I couldn't see how anyone would guess what it meant. The second, is why would whoever wrote it give that warning at all? Anyone who was supposed to come to the dungeon as a friend certainly would have been told to not attack the demons. And anyone else... well, it would be like giving a cryptic message above your door to any prospective burglar to go around to the back door to avoid the house alarm.
Yeah, the above are nits... But I have a large number of modules which are both high quality adventures and don't have the issues I describe. So, my question is: is the boxed set (which has the 2nd edition of Assault on Blacktooth Ridge), better quality that the 1st edition of the module in question?