There doesn't seem to be anything that's "broke," as far as I can recollect so I wouldn't think there'd be anything in that capacity. I would expect clarifications (like the SR1 stuff, EV clarifications, etc) to be in a new printing. I guess this is wishful thinking on my part - I don't see any issues with the classes, races, and the rules themselves (don't care for some of the new spells, but that's my own issue) so I'm hoping not much more gets "tweaked." The type of revisions like the ones listed above would be welcome, in my opinion, but I'd rather not have any of the remade of classes, and things like that. And with Steve's post, I think this is exactly what it will be - some errata, some clairifications, etc. The 'guts" as he said, would not be changing. I was on board the first time around because I totally agreed with the barbarianand monk revisions, as well as sporucing up the illusionist spell selection. I guess if Steve threw out there some really good stuff, and good reasoning for it, I'd most likely be on board again. TLG has my support, no doubt, but I still have to justify where teh gaming budget dollars go.
