Tracking for non-rangers
Tracking for non-rangers
At present, my A-series players are without a ranger. They've had to make some tracking rolls from time to time. Per the rules, I don't allow them to add their level to the roll. I also added a challenge level of 10. Seems like I remember from the ckg with that sort of guidline. Is that right?
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
I just go from the "PHB". No levels added and the result is never as good if successful, as a PC who has it as a class skill.tylermo wrote:At present, my A-series players are without a ranger. They've had to make some tracking rolls from time to time. Per the rules, I don't allow them to add their level to the roll. I also added a challenge level of 10. Seems like I remember from the ckg with that sort of guidline. Is that right?
- DeadReborn
- Ulthal
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 7:00 am
- Location: Port Charlotte, FL
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
Sounds right to me. I don't own the CKG, though, so I don't know if that's in there or not.
"My simple card trick has turned you into an ice cream cone!
Which means...I AM A LEVEL TEN WIZARD!"-SpongeBob SquarePants
Which means...I AM A LEVEL TEN WIZARD!"-SpongeBob SquarePants
- Omote
- Battle Stag
- Posts: 11560
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
- Contact:
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
This right about here.Arduin wrote:I just go from the "PHB". No levels added and the result is never as good if successful, as a PC who has it as a class skill.tylermo wrote:At present, my A-series players are without a ranger. They've had to make some tracking rolls from time to time. Per the rules, I don't allow them to add their level to the roll. I also added a challenge level of 10. Seems like I remember from the ckg with that sort of guidline. Is that right?
~O
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
I allow some class abilities to be used by all, but without the level bonus,and at a reduced effectiveness.
In regards to 'Track', I allow:
"TRACK: Allows the character to successfully track any creature in a wilderness setting that leaves a discernible trace. Checks are made every 5 hours. Characters cannot determine specific features about the creature tracked, such as numbers, type or status (injured, etc)."
The additional Ranger abilities regarding Track are not available to non-rangers. Additionally, I rule that Rangers do not need to make a roll for a basic track check, only if they are trying to use the 'advanced' ranger abilities (number of creatures, types, distinguishing features, etc).
In regards to 'Track', I allow:
"TRACK: Allows the character to successfully track any creature in a wilderness setting that leaves a discernible trace. Checks are made every 5 hours. Characters cannot determine specific features about the creature tracked, such as numbers, type or status (injured, etc)."
The additional Ranger abilities regarding Track are not available to non-rangers. Additionally, I rule that Rangers do not need to make a roll for a basic track check, only if they are trying to use the 'advanced' ranger abilities (number of creatures, types, distinguishing features, etc).
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
Yep.ThrorII wrote:I allow some class abilities to be used by all, but without the level bonus,and at a reduced effectiveness.
In regards to 'Track', I allow:
"TRACK: Allows the character to successfully track any creature in a wilderness setting that leaves a discernible trace. Checks are made every 5 hours. Characters cannot determine specific features about the creature tracked, such as numbers, type or status (injured, etc)."
The additional Ranger abilities regarding Track are not available to non-rangers. Additionally, I rule that Rangers do not need to make a roll for a basic track check, only if they are trying to use the 'advanced' ranger abilities (number of creatures, types, distinguishing features, etc).
R-
Castles & Crusades: What 3rd Edition AD&D should have been.
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
Anyone can step into a giant's footprint and "find the track." Only a ranger can tell you that the giant recently ate beans with Chianti and might have gout. Likewise, anyone can follow known (and spotted) bird droppings but the ranger can know that one of them is a new mother and is carrying a golden necklace for its nest.
Basically... there are the "everyman" things and there are then the "you must be skilled to know that" things. Where the line is drawn is up to the Castle Keeper.
Basically... there are the "everyman" things and there are then the "you must be skilled to know that" things. Where the line is drawn is up to the Castle Keeper.
- kreider204
- Unkbartig
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:01 pm
- Location: NE Wisconsin
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
That's pretty much how I handle it too. I don't even call it "tracking" in the case of non-rangers - it's just a general perception roll.serleran wrote: Basically... there are the "everyman" things and there are then the "you must be skilled to know that" things. Where the line is drawn is up to the Castle Keeper.
-
Lord Dynel
- Maukling
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
Echoing the previous posters, I, too follow the PHB and allow check sans the level bonus. I'd make exceptions, though, such as the character in question should kind of have an idea what he's doing before I allow a roll. Barbarian - sure. Rogue - sure. Wizard - not likely, unless something in his backstory would allow for it (such as he was an apprentice to an investigator-type wizard or some such). I try to follow some sort of logic when allowing non-class ability checks. YMMV, of course. 
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
Re: Tracking for non-rangers
Lets also remember that even though it would be without adding levels they could still get situational modifiers that either help or hurt them.
So if they are trying to track a group of Ogres you might give them an additional +1 per Ogre in the group, Ranger or not. They won't be like the Ranger saying there are 6 Ogres, 2 of them wearing some kind of heavy armor, armed with a variety of two handed swords and bearded axes. They will be able to say, "A group of large creatures went West, and this is their trail.", assuming they make the roll.
So even if there are no Rangers in the group, tracking will not be necessarily impossible, but it certainly will not be as easy, or as informative. Unless, of course, they are tracking something that is good at hiding its trail. Or is small. Things like that.
So if they are trying to track a group of Ogres you might give them an additional +1 per Ogre in the group, Ranger or not. They won't be like the Ranger saying there are 6 Ogres, 2 of them wearing some kind of heavy armor, armed with a variety of two handed swords and bearded axes. They will be able to say, "A group of large creatures went West, and this is their trail.", assuming they make the roll.
So even if there are no Rangers in the group, tracking will not be necessarily impossible, but it certainly will not be as easy, or as informative. Unless, of course, they are tracking something that is good at hiding its trail. Or is small. Things like that.
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.