Dumb question: does 2nd printing = 2nd edition?

Open Discussion on all things C&C from new product to general questions to the rules, the laws, and the chaos.
Post Reply
lecruit
Skobbit
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:00 am

Dumb question: does 2nd printing = 2nd edition?

Post by lecruit »

Ive seen both used but I would just like to get a clarification.

Thanks!

Fizz
Lore Drake
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:00 am

Re: Dumb question: does 2nd printing = 2nd edition?

Post by Fizz »

lecruit wrote:
Ive seen both used but I would just like to get a clarification.

2nd printing is the appropriate term. It clarifies many rules, has some additions, clears up typos, and has a new layout. But the 2nd printing does not alter anything significantly from the 1st print run.

That said, if you have a choice, get the 2nd printing. The improved layout alone is worth it- much easier and enjoyable to read.

-Fizz

User avatar
gideon_thorne
Maukling
Posts: 6176
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Contact:

Re: Dumb question: does 2nd printing = 2nd edition?

Post by gideon_thorne »

lecruit wrote:
does 2nd printing = 2nd edition?

No.
A new edition would be a complete revision of rules. A new printing is just that, a new printing. Erratta fixed, typo's fixed, layout polished, but still a new printing.
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven

Peter Bradley
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, 'Save us!' And I'll look down, and whisper 'No.' " ~Rorschach

lecruit
Skobbit
Posts: 10
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 8:00 am

Post by lecruit »

Thanks for the answers, guys. I had seen them used, at least I thought so, interchangeably and I wanted to get clarification.

User avatar
DangerDwarf
Maukling
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
Location: East Texas

Post by DangerDwarf »

Well, I think some of the confusion comes from people utilizing 2nd Edition in reference to AD&D, without actually stating they are talking about AD&D.

I know I'm guilty of it, I view C&C as another edition of AD&D.

Fizz
Lore Drake
Posts: 1111
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:00 am

Post by Fizz »

DangerDwarf wrote:
Well, I think some of the confusion comes from people utilizing 2nd Edition in reference to AD&D, without actually stating they are talking about AD&D.

Excellent point. I know i talk about 2nd Ed a lot as well, and when i do i'm always referring to AD&D 2nd Ed.

-Fizz

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

Some argue, vehemently, that the 2nd printing is a 2nd edition, because there are some "new rules" included, like the encumbrance clarifications, and poisons listed in the assassin class. However, these things were meant to be in the first printing, and are, hence, simply added errata to make a more cohesive system. Anyway, the core rules for C&C have not changed, nor will they, even from the box set to the hardback to the new "basic." The only book that significantly "alters" C&C is the CKG, and that doesn't radically change anything, either. It just clarifies how things work, and shows how to use that to make things different, if that's your inclination.

Post Reply