Encumbrance Rules Question

Open Discussion on all things C&C from new product to general questions to the rules, the laws, and the chaos.
Post Reply
User avatar
nwelte1
Lore Drake
Posts: 1621
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 7:00 am

Encumbrance Rules Question

Post by nwelte1 »

I have the PHB 3ed. P 45 has the rules for worn and capacity objects. The example given seems wrong and the rule makes little sense.

The example given is a backpack (2 ev/ 1 if w) carrying a bedroll (3) hammer (2), 50 nails (1) and 50 feet of silk rope (2). The example states the total capacity of the items inside is 5 and 6 with the bag counted and worn.

How? The says "reduce the total EV inside by -2." Per this rule the total capacity of 8 is reduced by -2 making it 6. Then add the 1 for the worn bag for a total of 7.

Am I reading the rule wrong? It also seems that the benefit of a capacity object is low. Is this intended? I think I saw somewhere else that others are allowing the capacity items to cut the total EV of the items inside by 1/2.

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

Encumbrance.

Its a sticky, by the way.

User avatar
nwelte1
Lore Drake
Posts: 1621
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 7:00 am

Post by nwelte1 »

damn I looked there too. I am just plain blind.

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

Heh, it happens. Just thought you might have missed it.

Post Reply