A beserker is definately a better name... and now I have images of Erik The Viking playing through my head... (with the father and son beserkers)...
Great stuff!
Moriarty the Red
Are Barbarians Necessary?
-
moriarty777
- Renegade Mage
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
-
slimykuotoan
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 3669
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:00 am
- Location: Nine Hells
Re: Are Barbarians Necessary?
Hmm
For crying out loud. Do your best with the rolls the dice have given you. This is what separates the men from the boys... -Kayolan
-
slimykuotoan
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 3669
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:00 am
- Location: Nine Hells
Re: Are Barbarians Necessary?
I think this thread was valid at the time, but believe with the introduction of the 4th printing version, the Barbarian has really become a stand alone class.
For crying out loud. Do your best with the rolls the dice have given you. This is what separates the men from the boys... -Kayolan
-
lobocastle
- Red Cap
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:00 am
Re: Are Barbarians Necessary?
No, but the C&C Barbarian from 4th printing onward is a nice class. I am developing a Basic C&C with only four classes, Fighter, Rogue, Magic user, Mystic. However, I am allowing advantages and secondary skills that will improve with character level, 1/2. I will allow multiclassing and class and a half, which mean most fantasy litterature characters can be simulated well enough including Barbarians and Conan.
JLL
JLL