has any body converted the beholder

Alarick · Post by **Alarick** » Wed May 07, 2008 4:09 am

has any one converted the beholder

serleran · Post by **serleran** » Wed May 07, 2008 4:15 am

I'm sure someone has (actually I know it has been done.) It cannot, and will not, ever be officially converted. I would ask that no one post the conversion, either, as it is a direct violation.

Alarick · Post by **Alarick** » Wed May 07, 2008 4:39 am

ok that makes sense

Zebulon · Post by **Zebulon** » Wed May 07, 2008 5:03 am

Is there really a need for a conversion, when it's so easy to use the AD&D version, having only to convert the AC?

phadeout · Post by **phadeout** » Wed May 07, 2008 2:16 pm

Zebulon wrote:
Is there really a need for a conversion, when it's so easy to use the AD&D version, having only to convert the AC?

My thought exactly. Conversions are so easy, if you have original 1E or 2E monsters, you can use them on the fly as long as you understand the SIEGE system.
_________________
"If everyone was drunker, was beer cheaper? And if they were more drunk the further back one goes, is there a time when everyone was completely soused all of the time? And, could I go there?" -Davis Chenault

dutch206 · Post by **dutch206** » Wed May 07, 2008 6:47 pm

I am assuming the "Prysmal Eye" doesn't qualify as a conversion, Then?
_________________
Please. I have dice that are older than you are.

serleran · Post by **serleran** » Wed May 07, 2008 6:50 pm

I don't consider the PE a conversion; I would maybe think of it as a redesign, in a way, but not a conversion.