Question re: Wraiths

Open Discussion on all things C&C from new product to general questions to the rules, the laws, and the chaos.
Post Reply
User avatar
nwelte1
Lore Drake
Posts: 1621
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 7:00 am

Question re: Wraiths

Post by nwelte1 »

Since the wraith's description states they can attack through solid objects, does this mean that they can ignore regular armor, natural armor, and shields as per 3.5?

anonymous

Post by anonymous »

No, because AC isn't broken down into categories as it is in 3rd edition D&D.

voynich
Ungern
Posts: 78
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:00 am

Post by voynich »

seeing as the player should very well know what ac bonus is being provided by his armor, a wraith should be able to bypass it. also, it is not difficult to determine what bonus, if any, a monster is getting from "armor" assuming they have armor. most that use it tend to mention the type involved and ac starts at 10. so, yes, a wraith ignores nonmagical armor, and against magical stuff, only the plus applies. but, that is only how i do it. i think not ruling that way makes the threat reduced too much to be effective.
_________________
the voynich manuscript is a mysterious illustrated book written in an indecipherable text. it is thought to have been written between 1450 and 1520. the author, script and language of the manuscript remain unknown.

User avatar
DangerDwarf
Maukling
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
Location: East Texas

Post by DangerDwarf »

Tenser's Floating Disk wrote:
No, because AC isn't broken down into categories as it is in 3rd edition D&D.

Not entirely true. Off the top of my head, I know the spell Acid Arrow requires a ranged touch attack to hit. So, while not specifically addressing a "Touch AC" the game does assume its existence.

User avatar
Omote
Battle Stag
Posts: 11560
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
Contact:

Post by Omote »

I definitely make a wriath's attack as touch attack. This makes the wriath an even more devestating opponent.

-O
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<

User avatar
bighara
Ulthal
Posts: 412
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 7:00 am

Post by bighara »

See p. 117 of the PHB (3rd Print)

Basically touch attack assumes AC 10, along with any special mods (concealment, etc.), magical protection, and/or DEX.
“Style is the perfection of a point of view.”

Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Post by Lord Dynel »

bighara wrote:
See p. 117 of the PHB (3rd Print)

Basically touch attack assumes AC 10, along with any special mods (concealment, etc.), magical protection, and/or DEX.

Which is pretty much the same as 3.x, if I'm recalling correctly.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

anonymous

Post by anonymous »

A wraith attack isn't described as a touch attack. The entry says the Wraith can walk through objects in order to surprise but not that its attack passes through armour. If you attack a goblin in 3E D&D (not in any previous editions) you know how much of its AC is down to its size, its dexterity, its hide and the armour is wears (which itself is then broken down into normal armour value and magical bonus) so you can have an armour bypassing attack. In C&C, this is not the case.

User avatar
Omote
Battle Stag
Posts: 11560
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
Contact:

Post by Omote »

Well, you could break AC down to different types of bonuses in C&C. It's not really that hard. Matter of fact, the way I accomplish this is via the RAW rules of the C&C PHB regarding touch attack.

Magical rings add to the touch attack AC, and pluses to magical armor, shields, etc (not the standard bonus that nonmagical armor provides). add to touch attack AC.

-O
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<

User avatar
DangerDwarf
Maukling
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
Location: East Texas

Post by DangerDwarf »

Tenser's Floating Disk wrote:
so you can have an armour bypassing attack. In C&C, this is not the case.

Yes you can, the spell Acid Arrow is an example of it and as Bighara so kindly pointed out, it is even directly addressed in the PHB.

User avatar
gideon_thorne
Maukling
Posts: 6176
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Contact:

Re: Question re: Wraiths

Post by gideon_thorne »

CK call. Personally, I'd have the critters ignore the armor. Wraith's are supposed to be a deadly otherworldly threat after all. Keeps the players on their toes.
Course, there is the flip side. Perhaps spectral entities are affected by the conductivity of forged metals like certain beings are in folklore.

There is a logic either way. It all depends on what sort of game your running.
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven

Peter Bradley
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, 'Save us!' And I'll look down, and whisper 'No.' " ~Rorschach

User avatar
DangerDwarf
Maukling
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
Location: East Texas

Post by DangerDwarf »

Yes, for the original question. I think it is the CK's call. If you choose to let them bypass it, C&C does have the rules for that in place.

I personally allow the attacks to bypass armor. I do however, give PC's opportunities to thwart the wraiths in that regard. Anointing your armor with holy water prior to battle makes the armor effective against the wraiths. There are a few other tricks a PC can use as well.

Valerian
Hlobane Orc
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 7:00 am

Post by Valerian »

I just give incorporeal monsters a x2 HD bonus to hit to represent speed, and incorporability . Simple rule seems to work. Beware spectres at +14 . I also give a CON save vs. level loss.
_________________
What is best in life-

To crush the PC's

See their character sheets piled before you

And to hear the lamentations of the players

-Conan the dungeonmaster

anonymous

Post by anonymous »

You enter the Chamber of Infinite Orcs...

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

The intent of the description (when I was still writing out what "incorporeal" meant, that being discarded as unnecessary), was to make the attack as a "touch," granting only magical and Dexterity-based AC modifiers. Wraiths, and all things like them, are beings of great fear.

anonymous

Post by anonymous »

Is this one for the errata then? Wraiths should make touch attacks like Spectres?

Treebore
Mogrl
Posts: 20660
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Arizona and St Louis

Post by Treebore »

Tenser's Floating Disk wrote:
Is this one for the errata then? Wraiths should make touch attacks like Spectres?

I think so. I should at least add it to my House Rules document so I remember that is how it was intended to be.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society

Next Con I am attending: http://www.neoncon.com/

My House Rules: http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael

Grand Knight Commander of the Society.

Post Reply