Quote:
Show me where either effect is outside the limitations of the spell?
Fine.
First effect:
Minor image produces an object, creature, or force (not in tandem; its one of these, not a combination or all three.) So, you have the force part. It will even produce a little bit of sound (but not understandable speech.) Where it fails is in the "does not create smell, texture, or temperature." If it is "ripping through a target" then I want to know what kind of force -- is it like a "slimer" from Ghostbusters, or is it something else? I bet either has a textural quality noticeably absent.
The 2nd effect fails at the textural as well -- acid has a definite quality: it would be wet. Actually, I just re-read that. You did not say "hit by acid" but "as if hit by acid," so the victim starts to corrode -- OK, what sort of acid then? There are several varieties -- some might cause the skin to discolor, and others to actually eat flesh. Which did you mean?
This is why it would not work so well -- the more I have to be told what is meant, the less you're pulling it off. Be more specific (this is not directed at you, Peter) since, in my games, if you want to do it, you have to convince me it will work and not make my imagination fill in your blanks.
Quote:
And yes, illusions are entirely about stepping out of the box. Hell, the entire C&C game system is.
No, it is about using what is provided as a framework to explore what is fun for you. The two things might be the same, but if it were entirely about 'stepping out of the box" there would be no rules.
_________________
If it matters, leave a message at the beep.
Serl's Corner