Rogues/Bards and scrolls
Rogues/Bards and scrolls
Does a rogues decipher script ability, grant him the ability to cast arcane spells from a scroll? His ability states that he may decipher the arcane script (at a -10 penalty), but says nothing of actually casting the spell.
The Bards decipher script states that he may decipher the arcane script on a scroll and then cast the spell.
Are the two abilities different or do they both allow for the casting of spells from an arcane scroll?
_________________
Never throw rocks at a man with a Vorpal Sword!
The Bards decipher script states that he may decipher the arcane script on a scroll and then cast the spell.
Are the two abilities different or do they both allow for the casting of spells from an arcane scroll?
_________________
Never throw rocks at a man with a Vorpal Sword!
- gideon_thorne
- Maukling
- Posts: 6176
- Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Rogues/Bards and scrolls
Maliki wrote:
Does a rogues decipher script ability, grant him the ability to cast arcane spells from a scroll?
As far as I understand it, the abilities are supposed to be the same, so yes.
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven
Peter Bradley
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, 'Save us!' And I'll look down, and whisper 'No.' " ~Rorschach
- Omote
- Battle Stag
- Posts: 11560
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
- Contact:
Good question. I've never run into this debate yet, but I know we're going to in the current campaign. A tough call, but I'd have to say that the Rogue could only decipher the arcane writing, not having the ability to cast any spell associated the with the writing.
-O
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
-O
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
-
Lord Dynel
- Maukling
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am
On one hand, I don't think this was an oversight - I feel there is a reason that the rogue's ability states that they cannot cast the spell...because they can't. On the other hand, though, I don't feel the rogue has the ability to just decipher the scroll and that's it. In the description of scrolls, it says that once a scroll is deciphered it can be cast. The bard ability description echoes this. I feel it was an oversight and that rogues can cast spells from arcane scrolls. At least that's how I'd play it.
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
This came up in play last night, and I ruled that he was able to cast the spell (knock) from the scroll. Partly because thieves could do this in various editions of D&D, plus it really helped keep the adventure moving along.
I set the CR at 23 (Intelligence prime, so 12 +10(-10 penalty for the arcane scroll) +1 for the spell level) Does that sound right?
He made the roll with a natural 20, +3 for level and +1 for Intelligence bonus.
_________________
Never throw rocks at a man with a Vorpal Sword!
I set the CR at 23 (Intelligence prime, so 12 +10(-10 penalty for the arcane scroll) +1 for the spell level) Does that sound right?
He made the roll with a natural 20, +3 for level and +1 for Intelligence bonus.
_________________
Never throw rocks at a man with a Vorpal Sword!
-
Lord Dynel
- Maukling
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am
Maliki wrote:
This came up in play last night, and I ruled that he was able to cast the spell (knock) from the scroll. Partly because thieves could do this in various editions of D&D, plus it really helped keep the adventure moving along.
I set the CR at 23 (Intelligence prime, so 12 +10(-10 penalty for the arcane scroll) +1 for the spell level) Does that sound right?
He made the roll with a natural 20, +3 for level and +1 for Intelligence bonus.
Sounds like you got it right to me...and sounds like he got it, bossman.
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
Quote:
In the description of scrolls, it says that once a scroll is deciphered it can be cast.
That is precisely why a rogue can do it. Also, and strictly speaking, if someone told you what to read off while holding the scroll (say, you're blind or can't read the language), it could still work... assuming the "translator" told you precisely. This has come up before in a game of mine, and I allowed it... the "translator" was smart and used a "thinking bottle" to do it, though.
It also means you have to keep track of which spells on what scrolls have been deciphered, and is one reason read magic is actually a useful spell.
_________________
If it matters, leave a message at the beep.
Serl's Corner
-
anonymous
If the rogue can't cast the spell, the ability is a bit useless...
"What's this?"
"Let me see... it seems to be a scroll which, when read out, will cast a Cone of Cold spell."
"Excellent - so now we can cast a Cone of Cold!"
"No. I can only tell you that's what it is. You'd need a wizard to cast the spell."
"You're not much good, are you?"
"What's this?"
"Let me see... it seems to be a scroll which, when read out, will cast a Cone of Cold spell."
"Excellent - so now we can cast a Cone of Cold!"
"No. I can only tell you that's what it is. You'd need a wizard to cast the spell."
"You're not much good, are you?"
-
Lord Dynel
- Maukling
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am
Tenser's Floating Disk wrote:
If the rogue can't cast the spell, the ability is a bit useless...
"What's this?"
"Let me see... it seems to be a scroll which, when read out, will cast a Cone of Cold spell."
"Excellent - so now we can cast a Cone of Cold!"
"No. I can only tell you that's what it is. You'd need a wizard to cast the spell."
"You're not much good, are you?"
That's pretty much it, in my opinion, Tenser. Without the ability to actually do something with the scroll once the rogue figures out what it is, what good is the power?
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
Maliki wrote:
This came up in play last night, and I ruled that he was able to cast the spell (knock) from the scroll. Partly because thieves could do this in various editions of D&D, plus it really helped keep the adventure moving along.
I set the CR at 23 (Intelligence prime, so 12 +10(-10 penalty for the arcane scroll) +1 for the spell level) Does that sound right?
He made the roll with a natural 20, +3 for level and +1 for Intelligence bonus.
My bad, the CR should have been 24 since knock is a 2nd level spell, but no matter he still would have made the roll.
_________________
Never throw rocks at a man with a Vorpal Sword!
Lord Dynel wrote:
That's pretty much it, in my opinion, Tenser. Without the ability to actually do something with the scroll once the rogue figures out what it is, what good is the power?
My thoughts as well, plus the bard could do it, and I don't see him as any more magical than the rogue, in C&C.
_________________
Never throw rocks at a man with a Vorpal Sword!
-
Lord Dynel
- Maukling
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am
Maliki wrote:
My thoughts as well, plus the bard could do it, and I don't see him as any more magical than the rogue, in C&C.
Agreed. And I also agree that this should be a "clarification" instead of "errata."
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
-
CKDad
- Master of the Kobold Raiders
- Posts: 1205
- Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:00 am
- Location: Somewhere in Maryland
This is something that dates back to the earliest days of D&D. Why? Two words: Grey Mouser.
_________________
"I don't wanna be remembered as the guy who died because he underestimated the threat posed by a monkey."
_________________
"I don't wanna be remembered as the guy who died because he underestimated the threat posed by a monkey."
"I don't wanna be remembered as the guy who died because he underestimated the threat posed by a monkey."
-
Lord Dynel
- Maukling
- Posts: 5843
- Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am
D&D had some great influences, for certain.
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
-
Mac Golden
- Hlobane Orc
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 7:00 am
ugh
Both can cast if deciphered. It should be the same.