Will-O'-Wisp

Open Discussion on all things C&C from new product to general questions to the rules, the laws, and the chaos.
serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Re: Will-O'-Wisp

Post by serleran »

One design philosophy of C&C was to provide flexibility to how the game is interpreted by each group playing, the final arbitration of a rule resting with the Castle Keeper of that game, highly relying on the unwritten Rule 0.

And, 2nd edition was never referenced, at least by me, for anything as it regards C&C's core elements -- I have converted things afterward, mostly spells and a few magic items. In fact, d20 was also ignored, except as it pertained to specific requirements for OGL compliance.

User avatar
Traveller
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 2029
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 7:00 am

Re: Will-O'-Wisp

Post by Traveller »

Lord Dynel wrote: As far as encumbrance goes, I honestly haven't looked at it yet, but I'll have to get on top of it before the next game. The maze spell changed? That's interesting, I'll have to check that out, too.
Encumbrance has been simplified when it comes to capacity objects. There is no more worn items modifications.

It's no longer possible to "wait out" a maze spell by sitting there and doing nothing for ten minutes. The only means of escape is to navigate the maze. Having that escape clause in there severely weakened what is supposed to be a powerful spell.

Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Re: Will-O'-Wisp

Post by Lord Dynel »

Traveller wrote:
Lord Dynel wrote: As far as encumbrance goes, I honestly haven't looked at it yet, but I'll have to get on top of it before the next game. The maze spell changed? That's interesting, I'll have to check that out, too.
Encumbrance has been simplified when it comes to capacity objects. There is no more worn items modifications.

It's no longer possible to "wait out" a maze spell by sitting there and doing nothing for ten minutes. The only means of escape is to navigate the maze. Having that escape clause in there severely weakened what is supposed to be a powerful spell.
I'm down with those two changes, especially the maze one. I always thought that was a cheesy tactic. :)
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

User avatar
mbeacom
Ulthal
Posts: 550
Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:51 pm

Re: Will-O'-Wisp

Post by mbeacom »

serleran wrote:One design philosophy of C&C was to provide flexibility to how the game is interpreted by each group playing, the final arbitration of a rule resting with the Castle Keeper of that game, highly relying on the unwritten Rule 0.
This is quite possibly the best single design philosophy I've ever read. It's no wonder I love the end results. :)
Witty Quote Pending
-Someone

Post Reply