Monster Tables by XP value

Open Discussion on all things C&C from new product to general questions to the rules, the laws, and the chaos.
Post Reply
dgrm44
Skobbit
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 12:17 am

Monster Tables by XP value

Post by dgrm44 »

I'm a newbie to C&C. Just got my books in the mail and looking forward to trying the system out with my group.
Are there tables that list the monsters by XP value so I can easily find monsters of appropriate level to challenge the group with?
Thanks!

User avatar
Snoring Rock
Lore Drake
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:00 am
Location: St. James, Missouri

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Snoring Rock »

C&C is not balanced so much by the mast like 3.x or Pathfinder. It is more old school in that regard. You have to get a feel for it, but I would start with using HD as the determinng factor and try matching your encounters by HD and then by number of PC's. So a good one would be if you have 4 PC's you would use 4 or 5 orcs. You could use 2 HD creatures but only 2 perhaps. A 3HD monster would need to be only one. As you get sme expereince you kind of get a feel for what your PC's can handle. But like I say, use HD as the determining factor. That rules BtH, saves, and Challenge Level so I use that, and it works great.

dgrm44
Skobbit
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 12:17 am

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by dgrm44 »

Snoring Rock wrote:C&C is not balanced so much by the mast like 3.x or Pathfinder. It is more old school in that regard. You have to get a feel for it, but I would start with using HD as the determinng factor and try matching your encounters by HD and then by number of PC's. So a good one would be if you have 4 PC's you would use 4 or 5 orcs. You could use 2 HD creatures but only 2 perhaps. A 3HD monster would need to be only one. As you get sme expereince you kind of get a feel for what your PC's can handle. But like I say, use HD as the determining factor. That rules BtH, saves, and Challenge Level so I use that, and it works great.
Is there a table that gives you all the monsters by HD? Basically I need something as a quick reference for monsters in ascending order of power?

Treebore
Mogrl
Posts: 20660
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Arizona and St Louis

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Treebore »

I agree HP is the main factor, but I also look at HP (how quick will the PC's kill them), AC (how often are they likely to get hit), their base to hit (how often are they likely to hit the party AC's), damage they do, and the number I want to use. In 3E and Pathfinder they give you those CL tables based on these same factors, as well as any variables magic will throw into the mix. If you have those resources, you can still use their equivalents to most of the creatures in C&C, but with practice you should get pretty good at it yourself pretty quickly.
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael

Grand Knight Commander of the Society.

Treebore
Mogrl
Posts: 20660
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Arizona and St Louis

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Treebore »

dgrm44 wrote:
Snoring Rock wrote:C&C is not balanced so much by the mast like 3.x or Pathfinder. It is more old school in that regard. You have to get a feel for it, but I would start with using HD as the determinng factor and try matching your encounters by HD and then by number of PC's. So a good one would be if you have 4 PC's you would use 4 or 5 orcs. You could use 2 HD creatures but only 2 perhaps. A 3HD monster would need to be only one. As you get sme expereince you kind of get a feel for what your PC's can handle. But like I say, use HD as the determining factor. That rules BtH, saves, and Challenge Level so I use that, and it works great.
Is there a table that gives you all the monsters by HD? Basically I need something as a quick reference for monsters in ascending order of power?
Nothing the Trolls have done. I think a fan did something along those lines after M&T of Aihrde was released, but I don't know where it is.
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael

Grand Knight Commander of the Society.

User avatar
NJPDX
Hlobane Orc
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:39 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by NJPDX »

dgrm44 wrote:I'm a newbie to C&C. Just got my books in the mail and looking forward to trying the system out with my group.
Are there tables that list the monsters by XP value so I can easily find monsters of appropriate level to challenge the group with?
Thanks
!
I know where it comes from and I've experienced it first hand but I find this approach to encounter design strange and unsatisfying. I say resist the urge to scale enemies to your group. Let them probe and test and decide if they want to hide, run away or attack.

User avatar
Arduin
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 4045
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:12 pm
Location: Granite quarry

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Arduin »

NJPDX wrote:
dgrm44 wrote:I'm a newbie to C&C. Just got my books in the mail and looking forward to trying the system out with my group.
Are there tables that list the monsters by XP value so I can easily find monsters of appropriate level to challenge the group with?
Thanks
!
I know where it comes from and I've experienced it first hand but I find this approach to encounter design strange and unsatisfying. I say resist the urge to scale enemies to your group. Let them probe and test and decide if they want to hide, run away or attack.
I agree. Feed it to them a bit slowly and they can decide whether or not to press on. It is important to note, coming out of the 3.x paradigm, that all encounters don't have to end in 'victory' for the PC's...
Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill

House Rules

User avatar
Sir Ironside
Lore Drake
Posts: 1595
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 7:00 am

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Sir Ironside »

NJPDX wrote:Let them probe and test and decide if they want to hide, run away or attack.
Might be unsatisfying to you, but his group might like playing the "kill things and take their stuff" style.

Even then I could still see monsters grouped by HD as being useful.

This could've been a useful appendices for all the monster books.
"Paranoia is just another word for ignorance." - Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
kreider204
Unkbartig
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:01 pm
Location: NE Wisconsin

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by kreider204 »

Sir Ironside wrote:
NJPDX wrote:Let them probe and test and decide if they want to hide, run away or attack.
Might be unsatisfying to you, but his group might like playing the "kill things and take their stuff" style.
Agreed. Let's not get off track and start criticizing the OP's style of play.

As for the OP's question, CLASSIC MONSTERS does have some handy reference charts for all three monster books. They aren't sorted by HD, but they are pretty easy to skim for HD in the range you're looking for.

User avatar
Arduin
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 4045
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:12 pm
Location: Granite quarry

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Arduin »

kreider204 wrote:
Agreed. Let's not get off track and start criticizing the OP's style of play.
??? I didn't read anyone criticizing the OP's style of play. Maybe another thread?
Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill

House Rules

dgrm44
Skobbit
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 12:17 am

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by dgrm44 »

I'm really interested in a chart that helps me get an idea of monsters relative power for quick reference, from their I can narrow it down. It would be helpful but not necessarily like the CR in 3.X/PF.

User avatar
Arduin
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 4045
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:12 pm
Location: Granite quarry

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Arduin »

dgrm44 wrote:I'm really interested in a chart that helps me get an idea of monsters relative power for quick reference, from their I can narrow it down. It would be helpful but not necessarily like the CR in 3.X/PF.

There is no company produced one. If you are starting them at 1st level you can use what you know from 3.x as they are basically the same monsters.
Old age and treachery will overcome youth and skill

House Rules

User avatar
NJPDX
Hlobane Orc
Posts: 102
Joined: Sun Jun 09, 2013 5:39 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by NJPDX »

kreider204 wrote:
Agreed. Let's not get off track and start criticizing the OP's style of play.

As for the OP's question, CLASSIC MONSTERS does have some handy reference charts for all three monster books. They aren't sorted by HD, but they are pretty easy to skim for HD in the range you're looking for.
Definitely wasn't trying to criticize, just offering an alternative approach to even needing the table in the first place. People should definitely play the way that makes them happiest.

User avatar
Sir Ironside
Lore Drake
Posts: 1595
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 7:00 am

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Sir Ironside »

Arduin wrote:
kreider204 wrote:
Agreed. Let's not get off track and start criticizing the OP's style of play.
??? I didn't read anyone criticizing the OP's style of play. Maybe another thread?
I didn't see anyone criticizing, I was just pointing out that this comment might not solve the problem if the group liked playing kill things > take stuff.
"Paranoia is just another word for ignorance." - Hunter S. Thompson

User avatar
Snoring Rock
Lore Drake
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:00 am
Location: St. James, Missouri

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by Snoring Rock »

dgrm44 wrote:I'm really interested in a chart that helps me get an idea of monsters relative power for quick reference, from their I can narrow it down. It would be helpful but not necessarily like the CR in 3.X/PF.
Agreed, and there are other things in the C&C rules and editorial quality you will find as well. The spelling and inconsistencies are a major annoyance, but the the game has no equal.

koralas
Ulthal
Posts: 525
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:00 am

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by koralas »

Arduin wrote:I agree. Feed it to them a bit slowly and they can decide whether or not to press on. It is important to note, coming out of the 3.x paradigm, that all encounters don't have to end in 'victory' for the PC's...
+1 Though I will add that 'victory' doesn't always come from force of arms.

Aside from that, HD is not always the best way to determine a "balanced" encounter. Sure in general more HD=higher "level" monster, but not always. Consider a Gargoyle (7HD) and a Ghast (4HD). As a player I would much rather face a gargoyle. BtB they have the same numbers encountered, same damage potential (though the Gargoyle has one additional attack than the Ghast, thus lowering the chance of getting the max), and the special abilities - Freeze for the Gargoyle (making them hard to spot when standing still, giving them a good chance of a surprise attack) and Stench & Paralyze for the Ghast, and lets not forget Ghoul Fever. Top that off with the Ghast having a better AC than the Gargoyle, and a much higher intelligence, they are a nasty, nasty foe. Of course, there is always the Undead factor and cleric's turning, but, unless all the creatures are turned, the fight can get ugly fast.

User avatar
ArgoForg
Red Cap
Posts: 341
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 8:00 am
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Contact:

Re: Monster Tables by XP value

Post by ArgoForg »

Might have already been said, but page 201 of the CKG does have an alphabetical list of monsters by Tier (Tier I = 1-3 HD, II = 4-6 HD, III = 7-9 HD, etc) to give you a a very general idea by HD. Of course, it goes on to say that Hit Dice alone doesn't make a monster encounter, so whether or not that will suit you is your discretion.
- "I just happen to prefer games where the GM actually has final say on rules and is not just the wall to roll dice off to decide what happens."

Post Reply