D&D and the Great Philosophers

All topics including role playing games, board games, etc., etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Aramis
Lore Drake
Posts: 1693
Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 7:00 am

D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by Aramis »

Even the great minds grappled with the difficulty of playing paladins :lol: :

http://existentialcomics.com/comic/23

Their discussion was eerily reminiscent of ones we used to have as teenagers ;)

User avatar
kreider204
Unkbartig
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:01 pm
Location: NE Wisconsin

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by kreider204 »

Ha, thanks! I'm a philosophy professor; I'll share this with my fellow philosophers / geeks.

User avatar
Lurker
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 4102
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 8:00 am
Location: Oklahoma

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by Lurker »

Aramis wrote:Even the great minds grappled with the difficulty of playing paladins :lol: :

http://existentialcomics.com/comic/23

Their discussion was eerily reminiscent of ones we used to have as teenagers ;)

:shock: :lol:

Well as my favored class is a paladin, I consider myself in good company there ! ;)
"And so I am become a knight of the Kingdom of Dreams and Shadows!" - Mark Twain

Forgive all spelling errors.

Knight Errant & Humble C&C Society Contributor
C&C Society

Treebore
Mogrl
Posts: 20660
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Arizona and St Louis

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by Treebore »

They just need a little Amter in their lives...
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael

Grand Knight Commander of the Society.

Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by Lord Dynel »

Pretty funny!
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

User avatar
kreider204
Unkbartig
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:01 pm
Location: NE Wisconsin

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by kreider204 »

I love that poor Kant is just trying to play the game, while the rest are just screwing with him ... :)

User avatar
Fiffergrund
Lore Drake
Posts: 1082
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by Fiffergrund »

I'm with Kant. But he should have flipped the table. ;)
Marshal Fiffergrund, Knight-Errant of the Castle and Crusade Society

User avatar
JediOre
Red Cap
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Missouri

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by JediOre »

By the end, I was a frustrated as Kant. :lol:
In the words of my good friend Trevor, "Hey, put an arrow in that flying mummy! What could possibly happen?"

User avatar
kreider204
Unkbartig
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:01 pm
Location: NE Wisconsin

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by kreider204 »

JediOre wrote:By the end, I was a frustrated as Kant. :lol:
I suspect D&D would be only one of Kant's many frustrations ... ;)

User avatar
JediOre
Red Cap
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Missouri

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by JediOre »

kreider204 wrote:
JediOre wrote:By the end, I was a frustrated as Kant. :lol:
I suspect D&D would be only one of Kant's many frustrations ... ;)

I'm very rusty on my philosophers, but of the lot that was in that comic, I felt a strong kinship with Kant. I'll have to brush up on him. Paladins are great and orcs ARE evil because the book says so! :)
In the words of my good friend Trevor, "Hey, put an arrow in that flying mummy! What could possibly happen?"

User avatar
kreider204
Unkbartig
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 9:01 pm
Location: NE Wisconsin

Re: D&D and the Great Philosophers

Post by kreider204 »

To be fair, the comic doesn't represent philosophy very widely. Everyone other than Kant comes from a fairly narrow subset of the philosophical traditions, so it's really contrasting two philosophical styles rather than several (as it might seem to). I would have liked to have seen John Stuart Mill, John Locke, Mary Wollstonecraft represented - then Kant really would have his hands full. :)

Post Reply