You are permitted ONE choice, but you may make honourable mentions afterward.
Pour moi, Conan the barbarian, hands -or swords- down.





slimykuotoan wrote:What is it?
You are permitted ONE choice, but you may make honourable mentions afterward.![]()
Pour moi, Conan the barbarian, hands -or swords- down.
clavis123 wrote:Another vote for Boorman's "Excalibur".
For me, in addition to the world building, atmosphere, and characters, the dialogue, scenery, low level of magic used / seen, and especially the pace of the film make it click. There are times for urgency and times for a more laid back pace. FOTR does a good job of keeping things interesting during its slower paced scenes. E.g. The Riddles in the Dark / Shadows of the Past segment between Gandalf and Frodo, the gift-giving from Bilbo to Frodo at Rivendell, the interaction of Arwen and Aragorn at Rivendell, the journey via boats down the Anduin to name just a few.Willy Rat wrote:Gotta fall in line with Tylermo and Ancalagon.
Fellowship of the Ring checks all the boxes for me.
All the LOTR films are amazing for their world building and atmosphere, but the characters and story of the first still gives me the most enjoyment.
tylermo wrote:Your efforts are greatly appreciated, Buttmonkey. Can't believe I said that with a straight face.
Ancalagon wrote:Fellowship of the Ring - Extended Edition
Honorable mentions to:
Return of the King - Extended Edition
DragonSlayer
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
Agreed and it's my pick, as well. Most faithful to its source material (except for Tom Bombadil). The Two Towers strayed way too far but Return of the King was back to being more faithful. Took my son to see the first Hobbit movie and refused to see the other two. I told him to stick to the book.Jyrdan Fairblade wrote:Yes! I love the whole trilogy, but Fellowship (Extended) is the one that has no qualifications to that statement. It probably was the most on-point of all the Jackson adaptations.