Stupidist monster ever:

All topics including role playing games, board games, etc., etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
slimykuotoan
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 3669
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:00 am
Location: Nine Hells

Stupidist monster ever:

Post by slimykuotoan »

What is it?
For crying out loud. Do your best with the rolls the dice have given you. This is what separates the men from the boys... -Kayolan

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

None of them, with the right DM. Otherwise... umm, anything with a template, the template itself, and everything in MMIII and MMIV.

User avatar
Tadhg
Cleric of Zagyg
Posts: 10817
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Somewhere in Time

Post by Tadhg »

Tough question. Thinking back to the MM and Holmes. Most of them, if not all, were great. Sometimes the drawings of the monster made them look somewhat silly, but they weren't stupid. Or if they were stupid, a good DM could make them less stupid (or silly).

In general, methinks some of the newer monsters (in that silly/stupid version of D&D) are just ludricris, but not necessarily dumb, just stupid with regard to abilities and stats.
[Does anyone think my post is stupid or silly? I do]
_________________
Count Rhuveinus - Lejendary Keeper of Castle Franqueforte

"Enjoy a 'world' where the fantastic is fact and magic really works!" ~ Gary Gygax

"By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes:" - Macbeth
Count Rhuveinus - Lejendary Keeper of Castle Franqueforte

"Enjoy a 'world' where the fantastic is fact and magic really works!" ~ Gary Gygax

"By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes:" - Macbeth

User avatar
gideon_thorne
Maukling
Posts: 6176
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Contact:

Re: Stupidist monster ever:

Post by gideon_thorne »

One group I gamed once with created the Neurotic Smurf. They could drive people insane with the endless repetaitive memnonic of their singing. ^_~`
_________________
"We'll go out through the kitchen!" Tanis Half-Elven

Peter Bradley
"The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout, 'Save us!' And I'll look down, and whisper 'No.' " ~Rorschach

SavageRobby
Hlobane Orc
Posts: 182
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:00 am

Post by SavageRobby »

The Flumph.

User avatar
bulletmeat
Ungern
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 7:00 am

Post by bulletmeat »

an ooze. . . low INT
Hey, someone had to.
_________________
Fry: Well, thanks to the internet, I'm now bored with sex.

User avatar
DangerDwarf
Maukling
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
Location: East Texas

Post by DangerDwarf »

Half-Dragon Treant

3rd Eye
Hlobane Orc
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 8:00 am

Post by 3rd Eye »

Rakshasas.

Or more accurately, rakshasa's hands.

I still have my original hardcover Monster Manual (circa 1981), in which the picture shows the rakshasa with perfectly normal hands, and not one word of the description says anything about the hands being backwards. Furthermore, even a little bit of research into the historical real-world rakshasa myths from India will reveal that nothing was ever said about their hands being peculiar in any way at all.

So I don't know when the "backwards hands" thing got added to the rakshasa in D&D/d20, but it wasn't there originally and somebody ought to slap the living crap out of whoever added it because it's the stupidest damned thing I've ever heard. Having the hands backwards like that would make it nearly impossible for the two hands to cooperate together on any task the wrists would have to cross each other to do so, thereby severely limiting the range of motion through which the hands could then move and all you need to do is look at any picture of a backwards-hand-rakshasa holding something with both hands to see how awkward and disfunctional the arrangement is.

It's unhistorical, it's illogical, and it's just plain stupid.

Rakshasas with functional hands were cool.

Rakshasas with backwards hands are friggin' retarded.

I hate 'em, I hate 'em, I HATE 'EM.

Sorry for the outburst. Just one of my pet peeves.

Besides, you asked.

User avatar
Jyrdan Fairblade
Unkbartig
Posts: 947
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:00 am

Post by Jyrdan Fairblade »

For fighters and clerics with bad rolls, a Rust Monster. You can bet stupid will be the mildest of epthitets used.

Fortunately it's 3e only (I think), but the Phantom Fungus has got to be pretty high up on the list.

User avatar
mordrene
Ulthal
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am

Post by mordrene »

I hate stirges. Every other thief I have ran has somehow become cursed with stirge bait and has ended in stirge dinner. I hate stirges.

Now, the dumbist monsters ever were the ones created at wotc for their monster contest which was won by meepo over of all things a tarrasque. I think the contest even had a behir paladin. thank god for gamers and cnc and their lack of number crunching.

User avatar
Jyrdan Fairblade
Unkbartig
Posts: 947
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 7:00 am

Post by Jyrdan Fairblade »

Seconded. There was a succubus paladin with a vrock mount, amongst other oddities.
mordrene wrote:
Now, the dumbist monsters ever were the ones created at wotc for their monster contest which was won by meepo over of all things a tarrasque. I think the contest even had a behir paladin. thank god for gamers and cnc and their lack of number crunching.

angelius
Lore Drake
Posts: 1134
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 7:00 am

Post by angelius »

Seriously most new D&D 3.5 monsters. This thread just makes me angry thinking about the dumbness.
_________________
Big Iron Vault Your friendly neighbourhood gaming magazine. Check out our new webcomic, The Heindrich Project!

Post Reply