BtH not part of Grappling, etc...?

Where CKs swap ideas and players figure out what's coming.

Moderator: Keeper Advice Moderators

Post Reply
Treebore
Mogrl
Posts: 20660
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Arizona and St Louis

BtH not part of Grappling, etc...?

Post by Treebore »

Could you explain why BtH may, or simply are not, added in when factoring things like Pummeling, grappling, etc...
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society

Next Con I am attending: http://www.neoncon.com/

My House Rules: http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael

Grand Knight Commander of the Society.

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

It is, for monk characters: "For example, characters who are not of the monk class who wish to punch or kick are attempting a pummeling attack." That very line implies the normal rules apply, and monks always get BtH for every type of unarmed combat maneuver - that is part of their archetype after all. This is a residual concept from level benefits are added only to those actions which would qualify for them, so, unless the CK decides Joe Blow the Fighter should be well versed in the arts of weaponless combat (probably very likely, but not so much for a rogue or wizard.)

Post Reply