Would YOU pay $14.99 a month to play 4E online?
Would YOU pay $14.99 a month to play 4E online?
WOTC to charge $14.99 a month for online play
Someone really needs to go to WOTC headquarters and let them know that online D&D != World of Warcraft.
Someone really needs to go to WOTC headquarters and let them know that online D&D != World of Warcraft.
- Breakdaddy
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:00 am
Doesn't matter what it is, I wouldn't pay $14.95/month for any online game. Just not as fun as regular group gaming to me.
_________________
Eulaliaaa!!! Give those rapscallions blood and vinegar, wot?!
Be sure to check out Jim's artwork for sale:
http://jimhollowayart.com/id5.html
_________________
Eulaliaaa!!! Give those rapscallions blood and vinegar, wot?!
Be sure to check out Jim's artwork for sale:
http://jimhollowayart.com/id5.html
- csperkins1970
- Ulthal
- Posts: 569
- Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: Staten Island, NY
- Contact:
Re: Would YOU pay $14.99 a month to play 4E online?
Montague wrote:
WOTC to charge $14.99 a month for online play
Someone really needs to go to WOTC headquarters and let them know that online D&D != World of Warcraft.
I never played MMORPGs and don't intend on starting now. I actually enjoy 3rd edition, despite its changes from AD&D, but think that 4th edition no longer resembles the D&D that I have loved for over 25 years. As such, I won't be buying in this time around. That saddens me because, for the first time, it's clear that I'm not the "target audience" for the game that got me into roleplaying and fantasy lit.
Looks like C&C and 3rd edition will be the end of the D&D line for me (unless 5th edition REALLY goes retro... which I highly doubt).
I have existed from the morning of the world and I shall exist until the last star falls from the night. Although I have taken the form of Gaius Caligula, I am all men as I am no man and therefore I am... a god.
serleran wrote:
No. I would not pay $14.99 per month to play C&C online. I find online play less than thrilling.
Agreed. I set up an online game with some friends around the country and while it had its moments it doesnt compare to the real thing. I can understand wanting to play with friends not in the area but paying THAT much money for it? No way. Heck you can get Fantasy Grounds for one full group for about $75 and you're done. That would only be one month's payment for a full group for WOTC.
Re: Would YOU pay $14.99 a month to play 4E online?
Montague wrote:
WOTC to charge $14.99 a month for online play
Someone really needs to go to WOTC headquarters and let them know that online D&D != World of Warcraft.
That's the same price I pay for online games (no, not WoW).
They've really lost their perspective at Hasbro/WotC. You can't charge the same price as a full-featured graphical MMORPG for something that's just a virtual tabletop, where the users self-entertain. It's insane to expect that to be successful.
Oh, and if anyone should care, the fantasy MMO I do play most often, and feel strongest about, is Lord of the Rings Online. If you've only played it at launch, you might want to check it out now. They've added a lot of new content and features, and they really seem to care about the game and its players.
Plus, I love an online fantasy world that actually has a coherent story behind it all ...
But your tastes may vary, and that's perfectly cool.
TheNewGuy
_________________
_________________
_________________
________
"But if your hand touches metal, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet, I will end you"
No here as well. MAptools is awesome enough, and free. I am also not interested in digital Dungeon and Dragon mags either.
However I am sure it will be successful. Just not with me and us.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society
Next Con I am attending: http://www.neoncon.com/
My House Rules: http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames
However I am sure it will be successful. Just not with me and us.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society
Next Con I am attending: http://www.neoncon.com/
My House Rules: http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames
Since its 20,000 I suggest "Captain Nemo" as his title. Beyond the obvious connection, he is one who sails on his own terms and ignores those he doesn't agree with...confident in his journey and goals.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
Sounds obvious to me! -Gm Michael
Grand Knight Commander of the Society.
As others have already said:
1. I wound't pay to play any rpg (other than purchasing books).
2. I wouldn't pay $14.99 for anything 4E
3. I don't do WoW or any of those types of games. If I want an rpg, I call my buds and we play an rpg.
4. When I do play computer games, there RTS games.
And to be perfectly frank, I agree that I am not the target market for 4E either. So while I will still play D&D (Basic/BECMI/AD&D) WoTC and I have parted ways. 4E is not what I think of when I think D&D.
Castle's & Crusades carries the mantle of D&D now, despite what copywrite laws, laywers, and WoTC may think. D&D as a copywrite belongs to them. D&D as a concept belongs to the Trolls.
But then, I'm a bit of a grognard, too.
1. I wound't pay to play any rpg (other than purchasing books).
2. I wouldn't pay $14.99 for anything 4E
3. I don't do WoW or any of those types of games. If I want an rpg, I call my buds and we play an rpg.
4. When I do play computer games, there RTS games.
And to be perfectly frank, I agree that I am not the target market for 4E either. So while I will still play D&D (Basic/BECMI/AD&D) WoTC and I have parted ways. 4E is not what I think of when I think D&D.
Castle's & Crusades carries the mantle of D&D now, despite what copywrite laws, laywers, and WoTC may think. D&D as a copywrite belongs to them. D&D as a concept belongs to the Trolls.
But then, I'm a bit of a grognard, too.
- Omote
- Battle Stag
- Posts: 11560
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
- Contact:
Not even, like ever. Boo.
-O
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
-O
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
- Buttmonkey
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:00 am
I'm with Tree on this one, MapTools is free and does everything that I need it to do for our online games.
And to Bighara: Right on, brother!
R-
_________________
Rigon o' the Lakelands, Baron of The Castles & Crusades Society
The Book of the Mind
And to Bighara: Right on, brother!
R-
_________________
Rigon o' the Lakelands, Baron of The Castles & Crusades Society
The Book of the Mind
Castles & Crusades: What 3rd Edition AD&D should have been.
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
Treebore wrote:
No here as well. MAptools is awesome enough, and free. I am also not interested in digital Dungeon and Dragon mags either.
However I am sure it will be successful. Just not with me and us.
Rigon wrote:
I'm with Tree on this one, MapTools is free and does everything that I need it to do for our online games.
And to Bighara: Right on, brother!
R-
I converted another two players.
- slimykuotoan
- Greater Lore Drake
- Posts: 3669
- Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 8:00 am
- Location: Nine Hells
-
Dragondaddy
- Hlobane Orc
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 7:00 am
Re: Would YOU pay $14.99 a month to play 4E online?
Montague wrote:
WOTC to charge $14.99 a month for online play
No. I wouldn't pay that to play C&C online either. I'm a tabletop guy all the way.
Re: Would YOU pay $14.99 a month to play 4E online?
Dragondaddy wrote:
No. I wouldn't pay that to play C&C online either. I'm a tabletop guy all the way.
Yeah, and that was more my point rather than a jab at 4E. Hey I loves my C&C but I'm not paying $15 a month to play it online.
After reading some of the EN boards, there are major concerns whether this thing will even be ready to launch by June. I'd love to see their market research that said this pricing was a good idea. If they did any market research other than "Hey, WoW charges $14.99!" that is.
-
pactmaster
- Red Cap
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:00 am
If there was video and it was strip D&D with the Dallas Cowboy cheerleaders, in that case, yes, yes I would. Otherwise, no.
_________________
Deserve has nothing to do with it, if you think you're entitled. You're not.
--Stephen Chenault
Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
J. R. R. Tolkien
_________________
Deserve has nothing to do with it, if you think you're entitled. You're not.
--Stephen Chenault
Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens.
J. R. R. Tolkien
I would not engage in such a horrorshow, even if family members were threatened with the Death of a Thousand Prods in the Navel if I refused to do so.
The only MMPOG I've ever engaged in is City of Heroes; and that game is so outright simple in terms of its set-up, mechanics and playability - and its pretty damned awesome graphics, especially the City of Villains spinoff - that it's almost in a class by itself.
A couple years ago I was persuaded to blow sixty bucks on D&D online; I played the game for two months, with an ever-increasing sense of boredom, and finally shut off the account and deleted the game from my hard-drive. I can't even remember where the damned game and its discs ended up after I moved in February of last year.
My familiarity with WoW is limited to the "Make Love, Not Warcraft" episode of South Park, and I'm perfectly content to let my acquaintanceship with that game lie there; I wasn't even aware that there was an LotR game online.
Finally, my interest in an online C&C game is pretty much nil; like many others here have stated, I think C&C was conceived as a pen-and-paper game, born as a pen-and-paper game, and should stay as a pen-and-paper game. Those who have embarked on the SKYPE version have, in my opinion, made the best of both worlds possible; cutting across civic, state (and even national, I would imagine) barriers to play together as humans rolling dice and engaging in imaginative description, not as digitially-projected images. Keep C&C as a game that human beings play face to face, if you will; I'm pretty sure that WotC will be more than happy to truck with electronic games for the forseeable future.
The only MMPOG I've ever engaged in is City of Heroes; and that game is so outright simple in terms of its set-up, mechanics and playability - and its pretty damned awesome graphics, especially the City of Villains spinoff - that it's almost in a class by itself.
A couple years ago I was persuaded to blow sixty bucks on D&D online; I played the game for two months, with an ever-increasing sense of boredom, and finally shut off the account and deleted the game from my hard-drive. I can't even remember where the damned game and its discs ended up after I moved in February of last year.
My familiarity with WoW is limited to the "Make Love, Not Warcraft" episode of South Park, and I'm perfectly content to let my acquaintanceship with that game lie there; I wasn't even aware that there was an LotR game online.
Finally, my interest in an online C&C game is pretty much nil; like many others here have stated, I think C&C was conceived as a pen-and-paper game, born as a pen-and-paper game, and should stay as a pen-and-paper game. Those who have embarked on the SKYPE version have, in my opinion, made the best of both worlds possible; cutting across civic, state (and even national, I would imagine) barriers to play together as humans rolling dice and engaging in imaginative description, not as digitially-projected images. Keep C&C as a game that human beings play face to face, if you will; I'm pretty sure that WotC will be more than happy to truck with electronic games for the forseeable future.
- moriarty777
- Renegade Mage
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
Not to sound like a supporter of Wotc's current planned business model but one has to keep in mind that it isn't just for the virtual gaming table/tools. The continued online content of Dragon and Dungeon that has become 'in-house' is also part of the package. If one gets a year subscription, it's $9.95 a month as opposed to $14.95
If you consider their past loyal customer base who were in the habit of buying the new "splatbook of x" then it is equally possible those are going to be keen on getting subscription to get access to 'exclusive' content and the like. In all probability, as time goes on and should this work out for them, we will start seeing fewer examples of books as people get used to the notion of getting their content in a digital form.
That said, I'm not a fan of MMORPG's in general and the typical pricing structure. However, I think the newer, and younger target audience will mind less about the digital nature of their content that they adopt.
As an aside, as much as I'd like to cut WOTC products from my spending budget completely, I previously admitted to being hooked on their plastic crack mini's. I also like the new set but at least I can take comfort in the notion that I use them exclusively for C&C!
M
_________________
"You face Death itself in the form of... 1d4 Tarrasques!"
Partner to Brave Halfling Publishing
http://www.arcanacreations.com
If you consider their past loyal customer base who were in the habit of buying the new "splatbook of x" then it is equally possible those are going to be keen on getting subscription to get access to 'exclusive' content and the like. In all probability, as time goes on and should this work out for them, we will start seeing fewer examples of books as people get used to the notion of getting their content in a digital form.
That said, I'm not a fan of MMORPG's in general and the typical pricing structure. However, I think the newer, and younger target audience will mind less about the digital nature of their content that they adopt.
As an aside, as much as I'd like to cut WOTC products from my spending budget completely, I previously admitted to being hooked on their plastic crack mini's. I also like the new set but at least I can take comfort in the notion that I use them exclusively for C&C!
M
_________________
"You face Death itself in the form of... 1d4 Tarrasques!"
Partner to Brave Halfling Publishing
http://www.arcanacreations.com
Um... I have some questions.
As has been mentioned on these forums before, there is a sizable chunk of the 3e community that plays using pirated PDFs. Now, I am not sure how large this segment of the community is. However, it seems to me that in a community that has a significant amount of piracy, as it appears the 3e community does, doesn't the $14.99 per month price tag seem somewhat outrageous? Will this price point really be attractive to the current 3e player community, even those that don't pirate?
Also, most of the gamers that I know have a very limited budget. Those gamers only play one MMORPG, if they play them at all. Many that I know, like many of the people commenting in this thread, refuse to pay a monthly subscription fee. Many can only buy a few gaming supplements per year.
I am not trying to bash anyone here, Based on what little I know of the RPG market, I just don't understand how WotC can build a business model around this.
As has been mentioned on these forums before, there is a sizable chunk of the 3e community that plays using pirated PDFs. Now, I am not sure how large this segment of the community is. However, it seems to me that in a community that has a significant amount of piracy, as it appears the 3e community does, doesn't the $14.99 per month price tag seem somewhat outrageous? Will this price point really be attractive to the current 3e player community, even those that don't pirate?
Also, most of the gamers that I know have a very limited budget. Those gamers only play one MMORPG, if they play them at all. Many that I know, like many of the people commenting in this thread, refuse to pay a monthly subscription fee. Many can only buy a few gaming supplements per year.
I am not trying to bash anyone here, Based on what little I know of the RPG market, I just don't understand how WotC can build a business model around this.
Would I pay it?
Sure. IF it was fun enough. If it let me play great games that I had a blast playing then I would be all for it.
I play and pay for MMO's and have for the past 10+ years. Im a 40ish year old adult who works and has a lot on his plate. My friends adn I can meet face to face at most like once a month so if the WOTC thing let us get together for 2 or 3 nights a week for a few hours and longer on the weekend I would be more that happy to pay it.
Now being good enough also means being far better than the free to play ones out now and even the pay to play ones. I dont mean the same or near it but BETTER by a long shot.
I for sure will not knock it till I know more.
_________________
Baron Golden, Knights of the Tin Palace (GameOgre)
Subscriber to Crusader Magazine!
http://www.cncsociety.org
Sure. IF it was fun enough. If it let me play great games that I had a blast playing then I would be all for it.
I play and pay for MMO's and have for the past 10+ years. Im a 40ish year old adult who works and has a lot on his plate. My friends adn I can meet face to face at most like once a month so if the WOTC thing let us get together for 2 or 3 nights a week for a few hours and longer on the weekend I would be more that happy to pay it.
Now being good enough also means being far better than the free to play ones out now and even the pay to play ones. I dont mean the same or near it but BETTER by a long shot.
I for sure will not knock it till I know more.
_________________
Baron Golden, Knights of the Tin Palace (GameOgre)
Subscriber to Crusader Magazine!
http://www.cncsociety.org
-
SilverFire85
- Mist Elf
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 8:00 am
I won't pay it either, but I'm also in the minority that won't pay for WoW. I refuse to pay a monthly fee to play a game that I've already paid good money for, and my bf agrees. The only online rpg that I've gotten into is Shaiya, but that one's totally free.
_________________
Put on your big girl panties and deal with it.
_________________
Put on your big girl panties and deal with it.
- moriarty777
- Renegade Mage
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
SilverFire85 wrote:
I won't pay it either, but I'm also in the minority that won't pay for WoW. I refuse to pay a monthly fee to play a game that I've already paid good money for, and my bf agrees. The only online rpg that I've gotten into is Shaiya, but that one's totally free.
I'm unfamiliar with Shaiya but I've heard of it. I'll need to check it out. I play Guildwars on and off -- a business model I can respect.
dkeester wrote:
As has been mentioned on these forums before, there is a sizable chunk of the 3e community that plays using pirated PDFs. Now, I am not sure how large this segment of the community is. However, it seems to me that in a community that has a significant amount of piracy, as it appears the 3e community does, doesn't the $14.99 per month price tag seem somewhat outrageous? Will this price point really be attractive to the current 3e player community, even those that don't pirate?
Well, don't assume that *everyone* pirates the material and doesn't buy any of the books. If no one bought any of the books, WOTC wouldn't have continued putting their stuff out. Delivery method may also end up being different from what one may expect. Their future plans also include the tools and not just electronic format of text. Sure... not everyone who's interested will buy-in to the whole subscription thing but since they will also be reducing their costs by going with this new model, it may and probably will still work.
Besides, recognizing the age of the younger audience being targeted -- they HAVE the disposable income. No rent... no bills... but all with ipods and other electronic gizmo's at younger ages. Like the tobacco companies, WOTC is endeavoring to get them while they are young!
M
_________________
"You face Death itself in the form of... 1d4 Tarrasques!"
Partner to Brave Halfling Publishing
http://www.arcanacreations.com
-
Wolfram_Stout
- Mist Elf
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 8:00 am
heck yeah
hi,
Heck yeah.
$9.99 (I can commit to a year) and I get:
Online version of every WOTC D&D book
Dragaon Magazine
Dungeon Magazine
Virtual Tabletop that I can use to play when the gang can't come over...
THAT I CAN EVEN USE TO PLAY C&C. (remember the VTT is does not adjucate rules it is strictly a get-together platform).
Wolfram
Heck yeah.
$9.99 (I can commit to a year) and I get:
Online version of every WOTC D&D book
Dragaon Magazine
Dungeon Magazine
Virtual Tabletop that I can use to play when the gang can't come over...
THAT I CAN EVEN USE TO PLAY C&C. (remember the VTT is does not adjucate rules it is strictly a get-together platform).
Wolfram
