FYI: Article on Teutonic Knights in Crusader #6

sieg · Post by **sieg** » Sat May 24, 2008 5:35 am

To all,

I allowed an error to creep into my paper in the "Historic Footnotes" section of the magazine; namely, the paper on the Order of the Knights of St. Mary (Teutonic Knights).

On page 22, the comment of "Fourth Crusade" being 1189 should read "Third Crusade" after all.

I assumed a different significance to the aforementioned date/reference, and we all know what happens when we assume right?

My sincere aplogies for any problems this might have caused....

Mike Stewart
_________________
Always remember, as a first principle of all D&D: playing BtB is not now, never was and never will be old school.- Tim Kask, Dragonsfoot

Treebore · Post by **Treebore** » Sat May 24, 2008 10:08 pm

That was no problem for me. One fo my wifes degrees is in history and she knew when the 3rd and fourth Crusades occurred, and set me straight right away. Which I confirmed the exact dates with some quick googles.
_________________
The Ruby Lord, Earl of the Society

Next Con I am attending: http://www.neoncon.com/

My House Rules: http://www.freeyabb.com/phpbb/viewtopic ... llordgames

serleran · Post by **serleran** » Sat May 24, 2008 10:16 pm

Wait, so that date was not in Sieg Reckoning? I have to go and modify my game calendar now?

You shall suffer for this injustice.

Indigo Rose · Post by **Indigo Rose** » Sun May 25, 2008 10:20 pm

serleran wrote:
Wait, so that date was not in Sieg Reckoning? I have to go and modify my game calendar now?

You shall suffer for this injustice.

And thus began the Serleran Fifth Crusade, and they feasted upon the orangutans, and the fruit bats, and the breakfast cereals...
_________________
Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.