Monster DEXTERITY and Initiative in C&C
Monster DEXTERITY and Initiative in C&C
C&C initiative states that a 1D10 is rolled and highest roll acts first. In the event of a tie, the opponents compare DEX scores with the highest DEX acting first. In the event of tied DEX scores, the opponent's actions are handled simultaneously.
Monsters don't have DEX scores, so how do you guys handle that ?
Is there a baseline statistic that could be used from the Monster Manual to determine the equivalent of a DEX score for the purposes of combat ?
It would have been nice to see some kind of note in Monsters & Treasures which lists:
"For the purposes of initiative, creature XXX is considered to have a DEX score of XX."
Monsters don't have DEX scores, so how do you guys handle that ?
Is there a baseline statistic that could be used from the Monster Manual to determine the equivalent of a DEX score for the purposes of combat ?
It would have been nice to see some kind of note in Monsters & Treasures which lists:
"For the purposes of initiative, creature XXX is considered to have a DEX score of XX."
- Combat_Kyle
- Ulthal
- Posts: 737
- Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: St. Paul, MN
- Contact:
Simple, I let the players win all ties for monsters without Dex scores. Now since most of my BBEGs are NPCs they have Dex scores.
_________________
CK the CK
"My goddess touched me at an early age."
-Grikis Valmorgen, Paladin
The beginnings of my homebrew campaign world and info for my play by chat game:
http://kbdekker.googlepages.com/home
_________________
CK the CK
"My goddess touched me at an early age."
-Grikis Valmorgen, Paladin
The beginnings of my homebrew campaign world and info for my play by chat game:
http://kbdekker.googlepages.com/home
- DangerDwarf
- Maukling
- Posts: 5284
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: East Texas
serleran wrote:
Technically, since monsters don't have Dexterity scores, they always lose ties.
Serleran, you and Danger Dwarf are freaking me out....You guys keep following me over here from Dragonsfoot. I'm going to get a restraining order!
Anyway, I responded over on Dragonsfoot that I didn't think that made sense considering real-world equivalents like the Tiger and the Wolf, which would always tend to act faster than a human.
Just my opinion though.
- DangerDwarf
- Maukling
- Posts: 5284
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: East Texas
- DangerDwarf
- Maukling
- Posts: 5284
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: East Texas
As far as I know there isn't a FAQ for stuff like this. I believe that the idea is, all that stuff is pretty much up to the DM at the end of the day. I just use a mental list going from
really slow (always go last) --> average (+0 to init) --> fast (+HD/2)
With inits inbetween those 3 major points as well...
_________________
Big Iron Vault Your friendly neighbourhood gaming magazine. Check out our new webcomic, The Heindrich Project!
really slow (always go last) --> average (+0 to init) --> fast (+HD/2)
With inits inbetween those 3 major points as well...
_________________
Big Iron Vault Your friendly neighbourhood gaming magazine. Check out our new webcomic, The Heindrich Project!
- Omote
- Battle Stag
- Posts: 11560
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: The fairest view in the park, Ohio.
- Contact:
I've always eyeballed tied initiative scores. Most monsters I give a DEX score of 10.5 (3d6) to. For monsters that are obviously more skilled in combat / dex I give a 1 4 (4d6) to. To monsters that are notorious for being slow or unagile, I give a 7 (2d6) dex. Most monsters have a 10.5 in my games though for ease of figuring.
So far has worked perfectly.
...........................................Omote
FPQ
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
So far has worked perfectly.
...........................................Omote
FPQ
_________________
> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <
Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society
@-Duke Omote Landwehr, Holy Order of the FPQ ~ Prince of the Castles & Crusades Society-@
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
VAE VICTUS!
>> Omote's Advanced C&C stuff <<
PeelSeel2 wrote:
I roll 1d10. Ties are simultaneous. Dex does not come into play.
Heck yeah. Why should PCs get all the breaks?
R-
_________________
Rigon o' the Lakelands, Baron of The Castles & Crusades Society
The Book of the Mind
Castles & Crusades: What 3rd Edition AD&D should have been.
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
I used to look at the monster and character and use common sense and make a quick decision.
But I like PeelSeel's way better and I will try it out for the next game. Simultaneous attacks sound cool and from my experience is European martial arts, simultaneous attacks happen A LOT.
Now that I think further on it, the d10 initiative in C&C is very much an abstraction. And since Dex doesn't adjust the initiative result, Dex really shouldn't play a part in ties. Ties just mean simultaneous results. I like that!
Thanks PeelSeel!
But I like PeelSeel's way better and I will try it out for the next game. Simultaneous attacks sound cool and from my experience is European martial arts, simultaneous attacks happen A LOT.
Now that I think further on it, the d10 initiative in C&C is very much an abstraction. And since Dex doesn't adjust the initiative result, Dex really shouldn't play a part in ties. Ties just mean simultaneous results. I like that!
Thanks PeelSeel!
- moriarty777
- Renegade Mage
- Posts: 3735
- Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: Montreal, Canada
serleran wrote:
...The CKG is going to have method(s) for determining monstrous attributes, as I've been told.
One more reason to make want the CKG even more... ARG...
Moriarty the Red
_________________
"You face Death itself in the form of... 1d4 Tarrasques!"
Partner to Brave Halfling Publishing
http://www.arcanacreations.com
- DangerDwarf
- Maukling
- Posts: 5284
- Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
- Location: East Texas
Rigon wrote:
Heck yeah. Why should PCs get all the breaks?
It's a percieved break. They see that and think:
"You know...our CK is great, always looking out for us. In the event of a tie he gives us the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, he's good."
Lull them into a false sense of security with a slight initiative edge then smash their hope and dreams like the despots we really are. It makes their cries of despair ever more sweet as they lay sobbing on the floor whining about:
"I thought we were friends!"
Mwuahahahaha *hack* hahaha*sputter* hahaha Cough* hah!
Sorry, sometimes I get a little maniacal.
DangerDwarf wrote:
It's a percieved break. They see that and think:
"You know...our CK is great, always looking out for us. In the event of a tie he gives us the benefit of the doubt. Yeah, he's good."
Lull them into a false sense of security with a slight initiative edge then smash their hope and dreams like the despots we really are. It makes their cries of despair ever more sweet as they lay sobbing on the floor whining about:
"I thought we were friends!"
Mwuahahahaha *hack* hahaha*sputter* hahaha Cough* hah!
Sorry, sometimes I get a little maniacal.
I like how your mind works.
R-
_________________
Rigon o' the Lakelands, Baron of The Castles & Crusades Society
The Book of the Mind
Castles & Crusades: What 3rd Edition AD&D should have been.
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
TLG Forum Moderator
House Rules & Whatnots
My Game Threads
Monday Night Online Group Member since 2007
