Sundog wrote:
Societies with freely-available quality education come up with more new and useful ideas than those which don't.
First, "free" education doesn't exist - people are forced to pay for it under pain of seizure of property and imprisonment. For anyone holding the view that coercion, theft, and kidnapping are immoral, this makes state education an intolerable system even before its results are considered. Second, those new and useful ideas have much more to do with an advanced division of labor than a state controlled education regime.
Sundog wrote:
how will anyone know how smart and talented you are when you spend all your time in drudgery?
An excellent observation... of our existing system!
Sundog wrote:
Further, who is this spotter of talent? What do they want? Your happiness as a well-rounded individual? Or a finely-honed set of skills to be used like any other tool?
To be sure, the market can devise ever more methods of finding talented individuals than I can manage, but for those kids whose parents can't afford to educate them, I can imagine a system combining top down and bottom up methods of getting talent into positions where it can succeed. From the top you might have scouts, philanthropists, and headhunters. From the bottom you might have aptitude tests, internships/apprenticeships, and third-party recommendations.
Motives for those looking for talent would vary, depending on whether they are working for profit or charitably. But one thing is for sure: the decision of what makes each person happy and the means to achieve that are not forced upon them by a third party but left to the individuals themselves to decide.
Sundog wrote:
Good education is the weapon of choice for the enemies of tyranny, which is why so many only want you to be as educated as is useful to them.
I agree that a good education threatens tyranny. That's one reason why the state - an entity that claims a rightful monopoly on the initiation of the use of force - is so interested in controlling the education system.
Sundog wrote:
With no protected right to an education, that's exactly what you'll end up with.
I disagree strongly that any positive right - "right to health care," "right to education," etc. - is either rationally defensible or helpful in fighting tyranny. To the contrary, in fact: positive rights can only be maintained through tyranny and thus are complicit in it.
Sundog wrote:
Education systems that appear to be failing need to be revised and updated, not done away with entirely. Evolution, not revolution.
As I mentioned, even putting aside the dismal results of public education, the entire basis for it is, by my reasoning, immoral. Such a structure demands to be demolished.
_________________
Unjust laws exist: shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once? -- Henry David Thoreau