Revisiting the Political Topics Policy

All topics including role playing games, board games, etc., etc.
Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Post by Lord Dynel »

I don't necessarily agree Fiff, but that's my opinion. I would actually allow such discussions, under the premise they not get out of hand - they would have to be watched closely. Not every discussion about religion or about politics is going to touch someones nerves. To me, it's about being an adult or being mature about it. I'd say ban the person, not the topic of discussion. If someone's acting like an ass in these types of discussions, then fire off a 1-week ban. I just think that if we're mature and responsible enough to handle these types of conversation (and before anyone says, "well, we're not" I've seen and participated in many across the net, personally) then we should be allowed to have them.

But that's my opinion. I, of course, will follow what rules are set forth. It just saddens me, a little, that the possibility that these types of conversations could devolve into childish and immature drivel causes them to be persona non grata. Just my two cents...thanks for listening.
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

User avatar
Fiffergrund
Lore Drake
Posts: 1082
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by Fiffergrund »

Lord Dynel wrote:
I don't necessarily agree Fiff, but that's my opinion. I would actually allow such discussions, under the premise they not get out of hand - they would have to be watched closely. Not every discussion about religion or about politics is going to touch someones nerves. To me, it's about being an adult or being mature about it. I'd say ban the person, not the topic of discussion. If someone's acting like an ass in these types of discussions, then fire off a 1-week ban. I just think that if we're mature and responsible enough to handle these types of conversation (and before anyone says, "well, we're not" I've seen and participated in many across the net, personally) then we should be allowed to have them.

But that's my opinion. I, of course, will follow what rules are set forth. It just saddens me, a little, that the possibility that these types of conversations could devolve into childish and immature drivel causes them to be persona non grata. Just my two cents...thanks for listening.

What you've just said sounds really good. If any community could pull it off, it would be this one.

Having said that, all it takes is one lousy incident to push people away. That's not what we do here. And to take the risk of doing so for something so off topic seems like an awful price to pay for the luxury of allowing yet one more soapbox. 99.9% of us here *could* be mature enough to handle it. That's not enough of a guarantee for me. The two cases I posted in the policy were also in groups that everyone agreed were mature enough to handle it. Everyone would have been wrong.

We're all gamers on this site, first and foremost. We don't even allow trash talk about other games here, as tempting as that can be at times. I was among the most vocal on Dragonsfoot during the Edition Wars era. I've slung my fair share of mud. I was one of those idiots that thought my own subjective view on what made a good game was really the objective "one truth." And I fought for it. Imagine allowing that when politics and religion are the topics of discussion?

I'm tired, and hopefully more mature now. I've seen enough disrespect in gaming groups, clubs, on gaming message boards....and in our society at large. I no longer have tolerance for it. I've been tempted at times to create a special forum that's password protected and accessible only by request, where no topic is forbidden. I've never followed through with it because someone would end up requesting access without really understanding what they will experience, or having a thin skin, or just looking to sling the f*c*s.

I'll never forget the moment in one of my groups where a participant walked in carrying a political book, tried to convince us it was holy writ, and looked SHOCKED that some of us didn't agree and forcefully disliked the viewpoints of the author. The goal of a rational, civil discussion where participants can walk away and still be friendly and get along - well, that became harder and harder to do as time went on because everything ends up colored by the political stuff.

I do understand all points of view on this. I wish I could convince myself to open the floodgates, as it were. I just don't see it doing much more than alienating people.
_________________
Sir Fiffergrund, Lord Marshal of the Castle and Crusade Society.

He Who Hides Behind The Elephant's Back
Marshal Fiffergrund, Knight-Errant of the Castle and Crusade Society

Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Post by Lord Dynel »

I completely agree with your post, bossman. I wish we could have an "open forum" (no pun intended) around here. That's still my wish. As much as I feel it would be alright, I do agree that there's a small contingent that would probably not be able to handle the responsibility. I'm not saying I should be the model citizen, but when I happen upon a topic of discussion that I don't particularly care for, or one that I stongly disagree with, I usually close it and move on. I wish this were especially the case in these types of discussion. Sadly, it is not so.

So even though (were it up to me) I would allow it an open topic, I see you point and respect your decision. And you're right, we're gamers - that should be the main focus of conversation, anyway.
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

User avatar
Go0gleplex
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 3723
Joined: Fri May 30, 2008 7:00 am
Location: Keizer, OR

Post by Go0gleplex »

There's a few around now that can barely handle the responsibility given them as it stands. I'm with Fiff...but it's like juggling with nitro. One oops is all it takes to make a real mess. Not worth the risk IMO.
_________________
The obvious will always trip you up FAR more than the obscure.

Baron Grignak Hammerhand of the Pacifica Provinces-

High Warden of the Castles & Crusades Society
"Rolling dice and killing characters since September 1976."
"Author of Wardogs! and Contributor to Iron Stars and Starmada-Admiralty ed."
"Certified crazy since 2009."

User avatar
nwelte1
Lore Drake
Posts: 1621
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 7:00 am

Post by nwelte1 »

The thought that a fair polite conversation cannot be had with regard to politics irks me. Ban the worst repeat offenders but leave the rest alone.

User avatar
bloodymage
Hlobane Orc
Posts: 145
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 7:00 am
Location: Bloody Krag in the Kyrian Confederacy

Post by bloodymage »

Trying to moderate real-world politics and religion on a gaming site is just asking for trouble. Kersus seems to handle it because he runs a highly eclectic site. For one devoted solely to games, it's a PITA.
_________________
Death to all PCs!

User avatar
Fiffergrund
Lore Drake
Posts: 1082
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by Fiffergrund »

nwelte1 wrote:
The thought that a fair polite conversation cannot be had with regard to politics irks me. Ban the worst repeat offenders but leave the rest alone.

It irks me too. Since I've yet to see a fair, polite conversation about politics, however, I'll stick with the policy as it stands.

It's important to keep in mind that things don't have to get nasty in order to have a negative impact. Sometimes, just knowing someone else's political viewpoint can cause a previously good relationship to take on extra negative baggage.

Granted, sometimes learning someone agrees with you can make a friendship stronger, but that benefit isn't worth alienating any gamers at this point.
_________________
Sir Fiffergrund, Lord Marshal of the Castle and Crusade Society.

He Who Hides Behind The Elephant's Back
Marshal Fiffergrund, Knight-Errant of the Castle and Crusade Society

User avatar
Breakdaddy
Greater Lore Drake
Posts: 3875
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2006 7:00 am

Post by Breakdaddy »

Fiffergrund wrote:
nwelte1 wrote:
...

It's important to keep in mind that things don't have to get nasty in order to have a negative impact. Sometimes, just knowing someone else's political viewpoint can cause a previously good relationship to take on extra negative baggage....

QFT! For example: When I found out that Omote was in a mariachi band it was a COMPLETE TURNOFF and now I want to kick him in the shins repeatedly!!!!11eleven!!
"If you had not committed great sins, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you."
-Genghis Khan

User avatar
Sundog
Red Cap
Posts: 248
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 7:00 am
Location: The Black Country, UK

Post by Sundog »

What's your position on Morris dancing?
"History teaches us that men behave wisely after they've exhausted all other alternatives."

User avatar
concobar
Ulthal
Posts: 774
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 7:00 am

Post by concobar »

serleran wrote:
I would expand the verboten topics, but not go straight to ban -- warning and then ban. Topic types I would restrict would include Politics, World Religions, and McDonalds vs. Burger King.

I agree. It seems odd that talking about politics is forbidden but people are free to denigrate entire religions. For many people religion is more important than political affiliation.

User avatar
Fiffergrund
Lore Drake
Posts: 1082
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by Fiffergrund »

concobar wrote:
I agree. It seems odd that talking about politics is forbidden but people are free to denigrate entire religions. For many people religion is more important than political affiliation.

See the revised policy. Religion is included in the ban.
_________________
Sir Fiffergrund, Lord Marshal of the Castle and Crusade Society.

He Who Hides Behind The Elephant's Back
Marshal Fiffergrund, Knight-Errant of the Castle and Crusade Society

User avatar
Naleax
Ungern
Posts: 70
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 7:00 am
Location: Prescott Arizona

Post by Naleax »

Personally i'm not sure why anyone would bring up politics on a board like this. I'm sure there are boards elsewhere for political discussion.

After looking at the policy though I think it is more than fair. If you are banned you broke the rules and brought it upon yourself.

User avatar
DangerDwarf
Maukling
Posts: 5284
Joined: Sat May 27, 2006 7:00 am
Location: East Texas

Post by DangerDwarf »

The dwarf in my avatar has an anarchy sign tatooed on his chest. Cant see it from this angle (or through his armor) though so I'm thinking I'm safe.

User avatar
Fiffergrund
Lore Drake
Posts: 1082
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 8:00 am
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by Fiffergrund »

DangerDwarf wrote:
The dwarf in my avatar has an anarchy sign tatooed on his chest. Cant see it from this angle (or through his armor) though so I'm thinking I'm safe.

That's ok. Anarchy, by definition, is apolitical.
_________________
Sir Fiffergrund, Lord Marshal of the Castle and Crusade Society.

He Who Hides Behind The Elephant's Back
Marshal Fiffergrund, Knight-Errant of the Castle and Crusade Society

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

Yeah! Anarchy wouldn't follow the rules anyway.
_________________
If it matters, leave a message at the beep.
Serl's Corner

Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Post by Lord Dynel »

If I'm thinking correctly, anarchy is still describing the socio-political state of a government and should therefore be banned from discussion. Talking about the absence of government is still talking about government.
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

The glass is neither full nor empty. It is both. The emptiness completes it.
_________________
If it matters, leave a message at the beep.
Serl's Corner

Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Post by Lord Dynel »

serleran wrote:
The glass is neither full nor empty. It is both. The emptiness completes it.

But it wasn't complete, wasn't nearly close to being in the same vicinity as complete...

...you...complete me.
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

serleran
Mogrl
Posts: 13905
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 7:00 am

Post by serleran »

I had you at "brains weigh 5 pounds."
_________________
If it matters, leave a message at the beep.
Serl's Corner

Lord Dynel
Maukling
Posts: 5843
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 7:00 am

Post by Lord Dynel »

Yes you did.

mmmmmmmm braaaaiiiinnnnsss
_________________
LD's C&C creations - the witch, a half-ogre, skill and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:
Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.
LD's C&C creations - CL Checker, a witch class, the half-ogre, skills, and 0-level rules
Troll Lord wrote:Lord D: you understand where I"m coming from.

Post Reply